refactor: Enable stricter test linting

This commit is contained in:
Joachim Van Herwegen
2023-10-27 15:53:52 +02:00
parent 6248ed0938
commit 7a007dc466
48 changed files with 179 additions and 155 deletions

View File

@@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ describe('PathUtil', (): void => {
// Note that this test only makes sense as long as the dist folder is on the same level as the src folder
const root = getModuleRoot();
const packageJson = joinFilePath(root, 'package.json');
expect(await fsPromises.access(packageJson)).toBeUndefined();
await expect(fsPromises.access(packageJson)).resolves.toBeUndefined();
});
});

View File

@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ describe('HandlerUtil', (): void => {
});
it('supports non-native Errors.', async(): Promise<void> => {
handlerFalse.canHandle = jest.fn().mockRejectedValue('apple');
jest.spyOn(handlerFalse, 'canHandle').mockRejectedValue('apple');
await expect(findHandler([ handlerFalse ], null)).rejects.toThrow('Unknown error: apple');
});
});

View File

@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ describe('A FileSystemResourceLocker', (): void => {
it('stops proper-lock from throwing errors after finalize was called.', async(): Promise<void> => {
// Tests should never access private fields so we need to change this after splitting the test as mentioned above.
// Once we have a mock we can check which parameters `unlock` was called with and extract the function from there.
expect((): void => (locker as any).customOnCompromised(new Error('test'))).toThrow();
expect((): void => (locker as any).customOnCompromised(new Error('test'))).toThrow('test');
await locker.finalize();
expect((locker as any).customOnCompromised(new Error('test'))).toBeUndefined();
});

View File

@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ describe('A GreedyReadWriteLocker', (): void => {
});
it('errors if the read counter has an unexpected value.', async(): Promise<void> => {
storage.get = jest.fn().mockResolvedValue(0);
jest.spyOn(storage, 'get').mockResolvedValue(0);
await expect(locker.withReadLock(resourceId, (): number => 5)).rejects.toThrow(InternalServerError);
});
});