bigchaindb/docs/server/source/data-models/transaction-model.rst
2016-12-19 12:42:54 +01:00

53 lines
2.7 KiB
ReStructuredText

.. raw:: html
<style>
.rst-content a.internal[href*='/schema/'] {
border: solid 1px #e1e4e5;
font-family: monospace;
font-size: 12px;
color: blue;
padding: 2px 4px;
background-color: white;
}
</style>
=====================
The Transaction Model
=====================
A transaction has the following structure:
.. code-block:: json
{
"id": "<hash of transaction, excluding signatures (see explanation)>",
"version": "<version number of the transaction model>",
"inputs": ["<list of inputs>"],
"outputs": ["<list of outputs>"],
"operation": "<string>",
"asset": "<digital asset description (explained in the next section)>",
"metadata": "<any JSON document>"
}
Here's some explanation of the contents of a :ref:`transaction <transaction>`:
- id: The :ref:`id <transaction.id>` of the transaction, and also the database primary key.
- version: :ref:`Version <transaction.version>` number of the transaction model, so that software can support different transaction models.
- **inputs**: List of inputs. Each :ref:`input <Input>` contains a pointer to an unspent output
and a *crypto fulfillment* that satisfies the conditions of that output. A *fulfillment*
is usually a signature proving the ownership of the asset.
See :doc:`./inputs-outputs`.
- **outputs**: List of outputs. Each :ref:`output <Output>` contains *crypto-conditions* that need to be fulfilled by a transfer transaction in order to transfer ownership to new owners.
See :doc:`./inputs-outputs`.
- **operation**: String representation of the :ref:`operation <transaction.operation>` being performed (currently either "CREATE", "TRANSFER" or "GENESIS"). It determines how the transaction should be validated.
- **asset**: Definition of the digital :ref:`asset <Asset>`. See next section.
- **metadata**: User-provided transaction :ref:`metadata <metadata>`: Can be any JSON document, or `NULL`.
Later, when we get to the models for the block and the vote, we'll see that both include a signature (from the node which created it). You may wonder why transactions don't have signatures... The answer is that they do! They're just hidden inside the ``fulfillment`` string of each input. A creation transaction is signed by whoever created it. A transfer transaction is signed by whoever currently controls or owns it.
What gets signed? For each input in the transaction, the "fullfillment message" that gets signed includes the ``operation``, ``data``, ``version``, ``id``, corresponding ``condition``, and the fulfillment itself, except with its fulfillment string set to ``null``. The computed signature goes into creating the ``fulfillment`` string of the input.