mirror of
https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd.git
synced 2024-09-27 06:25:44 +00:00
Merge pull request #14111 from patrocinio/check_perf_doc
Doc: provide more clarify to the usage of check perf command
This commit is contained in:
commit
43434afd48
@ -376,7 +376,7 @@ Prints the compacted revision.
|
||||
|
||||
### WATCH [options] [key or prefix] [range_end] [--] [exec-command arg1 arg2 ...]
|
||||
|
||||
Watch watches events stream on keys or prefixes, [key or prefix, range_end) if range_end is given. The watch command runs until it encounters an error or is terminated by the user. If range_end is given, it must be lexicographically greater than key or "\x00".
|
||||
Watch watches events stream on keys or prefixes, [key or prefix, range_end) if range_end is given. The watch command runs until it encounters an error or is terminated by the user. If range_end is given, it must be lexicographically greater than key or "\x00".
|
||||
|
||||
RPC: Watch
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1505,6 +1505,26 @@ CHECK provides commands for checking properties of the etcd cluster.
|
||||
|
||||
CHECK PERF checks the performance of the etcd cluster for 60 seconds. Running the `check perf` often can create a large keyspace history which can be auto compacted and defragmented using the `--auto-compact` and `--auto-defrag` options as described below.
|
||||
|
||||
Notice that different workload models use different configurations in terms of number of clients and throughtput. Here is the configuration for each load:
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
| Load | Number of clients | Number of put requests (requests/sec) |
|
||||
|---------|------|---------|
|
||||
| Small | 50 | 10000 |
|
||||
| Medium | 200 | 100000 |
|
||||
| Large | 500 | 1000000 |
|
||||
| xLarge | 1000 | 3000000 |
|
||||
|
||||
The test checks for the following conditions:
|
||||
|
||||
- The throughput should be at least 90% of the issued requets
|
||||
- All the requests should be done in less than 500 ms
|
||||
- The standard deviation of the requests should be less than 100 ms
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Hence, a workload model may work while another one might fail.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
RPC: CheckPerf
|
||||
|
||||
#### Options
|
||||
|
@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ func NewCheckPerfCommand() *cobra.Command {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// TODO: support customized configuration
|
||||
cmd.Flags().StringVar(&checkPerfLoad, "load", "s", "The performance check's workload model. Accepted workloads: s(small), m(medium), l(large), xl(xLarge)")
|
||||
cmd.Flags().StringVar(&checkPerfLoad, "load", "s", "The performance check's workload model. Accepted workloads: s(small), m(medium), l(large), xl(xLarge). Different workload models use different configurations in terms of number of clients and expected throughtput.")
|
||||
cmd.Flags().StringVar(&checkPerfPrefix, "prefix", "/etcdctl-check-perf/", "The prefix for writing the performance check's keys.")
|
||||
cmd.Flags().BoolVar(&autoCompact, "auto-compact", false, "Compact storage with last revision after test is finished.")
|
||||
cmd.Flags().BoolVar(&autoDefrag, "auto-defrag", false, "Defragment storage after test is finished.")
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user