Rollback the pull/14080: which fixed the potential deadlock

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Wang <benjamin.ahrtr@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
Benjamin Wang 2023-12-04 12:39:29 +00:00
parent d8f077151d
commit 9a6eeb5f7e

View File

@ -281,10 +281,6 @@ func (le *lessor) Grant(id LeaseID, ttl int64) (*Lease, error) {
// with longer TTL to reduce renew load.
l := NewLease(id, ttl)
if l.ttl < le.minLeaseTTL {
l.ttl = le.minLeaseTTL
}
le.mu.Lock()
defer le.mu.Unlock()
@ -292,6 +288,10 @@ func (le *lessor) Grant(id LeaseID, ttl int64) (*Lease, error) {
return nil, ErrLeaseExists
}
if l.ttl < le.minLeaseTTL {
l.ttl = le.minLeaseTTL
}
if le.isPrimary() {
l.refresh(0)
} else {
@ -322,11 +322,6 @@ func (le *lessor) Revoke(id LeaseID) error {
return ErrLeaseNotFound
}
// We shouldn't delete the lease inside the transaction lock, otherwise
// it may lead to deadlock with Grant or Checkpoint operations, which
// acquire the le.mu firstly and then the batchTx lock.
delete(le.leaseMap, id)
defer close(l.revokec)
// unlock before doing external work
le.mu.Unlock()
@ -345,6 +340,9 @@ func (le *lessor) Revoke(id LeaseID) error {
txn.DeleteRange([]byte(key), nil)
}
le.mu.Lock()
defer le.mu.Unlock()
delete(le.leaseMap, l.ID)
// lease deletion needs to be in the same backend transaction with the
// kv deletion. Or we might end up with not executing the revoke or not
// deleting the keys if etcdserver fails in between.