mirror of
https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd.git
synced 2024-09-27 06:25:44 +00:00
docs: rewrite existing docs instead of adding a new section
@xiang90 pointed out my earlier commit duplicated a lot of things that were mentioned earlier in the doc. This time around I tried just making some gotchas more explicit in the existing docs instead of just tacking new stuff onto the end.
This commit is contained in:
parent
5be545b872
commit
b94f6595e6
@ -277,27 +277,29 @@ The first terminal should get the notification and return with the same response
|
||||
However, the watch command can do more than this.
|
||||
Using the index, we can watch for commands that have happened in the past.
|
||||
This is useful for ensuring you don't miss events between watch commands.
|
||||
Typically, we watch again from the (modifiedIndex + 1) of the node we got.
|
||||
Typically, we watch again from the `modifiedIndex + 1` of the node we got.
|
||||
|
||||
Let's try to watch for the set command of index 7 again:
|
||||
If we were to restart the watch from index 8 with:
|
||||
|
||||
```sh
|
||||
curl 'http://127.0.0.1:2379/v2/keys/foo?wait=true&waitIndex=7'
|
||||
curl 'http://127.0.0.1:2379/v2/keys/foo?wait=true&waitIndex=8'
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The watch command returns immediately with the same response as previously.
|
||||
Then even if etcd is on index 50, the first event to occur to the `/foo` key
|
||||
between 8 and 50 will be returned.
|
||||
|
||||
**Note**: etcd only keeps the responses of the most recent 1000 events across all etcd keys.
|
||||
It is recommended to send the response to another thread to process immediately
|
||||
instead of blocking the watch while processing the result.
|
||||
|
||||
If we miss all the 1000 events, we need to recover the current state of the
|
||||
watching key space. First, We do a get and then start to watch from the (etcdIndex + 1).
|
||||
watching key space. First, We do a get and then start to watch from the
|
||||
`X-Etcd-Index + 1`.
|
||||
|
||||
For example, we set `/foo="bar"` for 2000 times and tries to wait from index 7.
|
||||
For example, we set `/foo="bar"` for 2000 times and tries to wait from index 8.
|
||||
|
||||
```sh
|
||||
curl 'http://127.0.0.1:2379/v2/keys/foo?wait=true&waitIndex=7'
|
||||
curl 'http://127.0.0.1:2379/v2/keys/foo?wait=true&waitIndex=8'
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
We get the index is outdated response, since we miss the 1000 events kept in etcd.
|
||||
@ -306,7 +308,7 @@ We get the index is outdated response, since we miss the 1000 events kept in etc
|
||||
{"errorCode":401,"message":"The event in requested index is outdated and cleared","cause":"the requested history has been cleared [1003/7]","index":2002}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
To start watch, first we need to fetch the current state of key `/foo` and the etcdIndex.
|
||||
To start watch, first we need to fetch the current state of key `/foo`:
|
||||
|
||||
```sh
|
||||
curl 'http://127.0.0.1:2379/v2/keys/foo' -vv
|
||||
@ -325,13 +327,16 @@ curl 'http://127.0.0.1:2379/v2/keys/foo' -vv
|
||||
{"action":"get","node":{"key":"/foo","value":"","modifiedIndex":2002,"createdIndex":2002}}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The `X-Etcd-Index` is important. It is the index when we got the value of `/foo`.
|
||||
So we can watch again from the (`X-Etcd-Index` + 1) without missing an event after the last get.
|
||||
Unlike watches we use the `X-Etcd-Index + 1` of the response as a `waitIndex`
|
||||
instead of the node's `modifiedIndex` for two reasons:
|
||||
|
||||
```sh
|
||||
curl 'http://127.0.0.1:2379/v2/keys/foo?wait=true&waitIndex=2003'
|
||||
```
|
||||
1. The `X-Etcd-Index` will be greater than or equal to the `modifiedIndex`
|
||||
2. If it is greater than the `modifiedIndex`, none of those indexes will be
|
||||
related to the key being fetched.
|
||||
|
||||
Using the `modifiedIndex` will be functionally equivalent for subsequent
|
||||
watches, but since it might be smaller than the `Etcd-Index` we may receive a
|
||||
`401` error more quickly than if we used the `Etcd-Index`.
|
||||
|
||||
### Atomically Creating In-Order Keys
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user