Merge pull request #14828 from ahrtr/identify_corrupted_member_20221123

Identify corrupted member depending on quorum

client/pkg/types/id.go

@@ -14,7 +14,10 @@
 
 package types
 
-import "strconv"
+import (
+	"bytes"
+	"strconv"
+)
 
 // ID represents a generic identifier which is canonically
 // stored as a uint64 but is typically represented as a
@@ -37,3 +40,17 @@ type IDSlice []ID
 func (p IDSlice) Len() int           { return len(p) }
 func (p IDSlice) Less(i, j int) bool { return uint64(p[i]) < uint64(p[j]) }
 func (p IDSlice) Swap(i, j int)      { p[i], p[j] = p[j], p[i] }
+
+func (p IDSlice) String() string {
+	var b bytes.Buffer
+	if p.Len() > 0 {
+		b.WriteString(p[0].String())
+	}
+
+	for i := 1; i < p.Len(); i++ {
+		b.WriteString(",")
+		b.WriteString(p[i].String())
+	}
+
+	return b.String()
+}

server/etcdserver/corrupt.go

@@ -251,6 +251,17 @@ func (cm *corruptionChecker) PeriodicCheck() error {
 	return nil
 }
 
+// CompactHashCheck is based on the fact that 'compactions' are coordinated
+// between raft members and performed at the same revision. For each compacted
+// revision there is KV store hash computed and saved for some time.
+//
+// This method communicates with peers to find a recent common revision across
+// members, and raises alarm if 2 or more members at the same compact revision
+// have different hashes.
+//
+// We might miss opportunity to perform the check if the compaction is still
+// ongoing on one of the members or it was unresponsive. In such situation the
+// method still passes without raising alarm.
 func (cm *corruptionChecker) CompactHashCheck() {
 	cm.lg.Info("starting compact hash check",
 		zap.String("local-member-id", cm.hasher.MemberId().String()),
@@ -258,59 +269,138 @@ func (cm *corruptionChecker) CompactHashCheck() {
 	)
 	hashes := cm.uncheckedRevisions()
 	// Assume that revisions are ordered from largest to smallest
-	for i, hash := range hashes {
+	for _, hash := range hashes {
 		peers := cm.hasher.PeerHashByRev(hash.Revision)
 		if len(peers) == 0 {
 			continue
 		}
-		peersChecked := 0
-		for _, p := range peers {
-			if p.resp == nil || p.resp.CompactRevision != hash.CompactRevision {
-				continue
-			}
-
-			// follower's compact revision is leader's old one, then hashes must match
-			if p.resp.Hash != hash.Hash {
-				cm.hasher.TriggerCorruptAlarm(p.id)
-				cm.lg.Error("failed compaction hash check",
-					zap.Int64("revision", hash.Revision),
-					zap.Int64("leader-compact-revision", hash.CompactRevision),
-					zap.Uint32("leader-hash", hash.Hash),
-					zap.Int64("follower-compact-revision", p.resp.CompactRevision),
-					zap.Uint32("follower-hash", p.resp.Hash),
-					zap.String("follower-peer-id", p.id.String()),
-				)
-				return
-			}
-			peersChecked++
-			cm.lg.Info("successfully checked hash on follower",
-				zap.Int64("revision", hash.Revision),
-				zap.String("peer-id", p.id.String()),
-			)
-		}
-		if len(peers) == peersChecked {
-			cm.lg.Info("successfully checked hash on whole cluster",
-				zap.Int("number-of-peers-checked", peersChecked),
-				zap.Int64("revision", hash.Revision),
-			)
-			cm.mux.Lock()
-			if hash.Revision > cm.latestRevisionChecked {
-				cm.latestRevisionChecked = hash.Revision
-			}
-			cm.mux.Unlock()
-			cm.lg.Info("finished compaction hash check", zap.Int("number-of-hashes-checked", i+1))
+		if cm.checkPeerHashes(hash, peers) {
 			return
 		}
-		cm.lg.Warn("skipped revision in compaction hash check; was not able to check all peers",
-			zap.Int("number-of-peers-checked", peersChecked),
-			zap.Int("number-of-peers", len(peers)),
-			zap.Int64("revision", hash.Revision),
-		)
 	}
 	cm.lg.Info("finished compaction hash check", zap.Int("number-of-hashes-checked", len(hashes)))
 	return
 }
 
+// check peers hash and raise alarms if detected corruption.
+// return a bool indicate whether to check next hash.
+//
+//	true: successfully checked hash on whole cluster or raised alarms, so no need to check next hash
+//	false: skipped some members, so need to check next hash
+func (cm *corruptionChecker) checkPeerHashes(leaderHash mvcc.KeyValueHash, peers []*peerHashKVResp) bool {
+	leaderId := cm.hasher.MemberId()
+	hash2members := map[uint32]types.IDSlice{leaderHash.Hash: {leaderId}}
+
+	peersChecked := 0
+	// group all peers by hash
+	for _, peer := range peers {
+		skipped := false
+		reason := ""
+
+		if peer.resp == nil {
+			skipped = true
+			reason = "no response"
+		} else if peer.resp.CompactRevision != leaderHash.CompactRevision {
+			skipped = true
+			reason = fmt.Sprintf("the peer's CompactRevision %d doesn't match leader's CompactRevision %d",
+				peer.resp.CompactRevision, leaderHash.CompactRevision)
+		}
+		if skipped {
+			cm.lg.Warn("Skipped peer's hash", zap.Int("number-of-peers", len(peers)),
+				zap.String("leader-id", leaderId.String()),
+				zap.String("peer-id", peer.id.String()),
+				zap.String("reason", reason))
+			continue
+		}
+
+		peersChecked++
+		if ids, ok := hash2members[peer.resp.Hash]; !ok {
+			hash2members[peer.resp.Hash] = []types.ID{peer.id}
+		} else {
+			ids = append(ids, peer.id)
+			hash2members[peer.resp.Hash] = ids
+		}
+	}
+
+	// All members have the same CompactRevision and Hash.
+	if len(hash2members) == 1 {
+		return cm.handleConsistentHash(leaderHash, peersChecked, len(peers))
+	}
+
+	// Detected hashes mismatch
+	// The first step is to figure out the majority with the same hash.
+	memberCnt := len(peers) + 1
+	quorum := memberCnt/2 + 1
+	quorumExist := false
+	for k, v := range hash2members {
+		if len(v) >= quorum {
+			quorumExist = true
+			// remove the majority, and we might raise alarms for the left members.
+			delete(hash2members, k)
+			break
+		}
+	}
+
+	if !quorumExist {
+		// If quorum doesn't exist, we don't know which members data are
+		// corrupted. In such situation, we intentionally set the memberID
+		// as 0, it means it affects the whole cluster.
+		cm.lg.Error("Detected compaction hash mismatch but cannot identify the corrupted members, so intentionally set the memberID as 0",
+			zap.String("leader-id", leaderId.String()),
+			zap.Int64("leader-revision", leaderHash.Revision),
+			zap.Int64("leader-compact-revision", leaderHash.CompactRevision),
+			zap.Uint32("leader-hash", leaderHash.Hash),
+		)
+		cm.hasher.TriggerCorruptAlarm(0)
+	}
+
+	// Raise alarm for the left members if the quorum is present.
+	// But we should always generate error log for debugging.
+	for k, v := range hash2members {
+		if quorumExist {
+			for _, pid := range v {
+				cm.hasher.TriggerCorruptAlarm(pid)
+			}
+		}
+
+		cm.lg.Error("Detected compaction hash mismatch",
+			zap.String("leader-id", leaderId.String()),
+			zap.Int64("leader-revision", leaderHash.Revision),
+			zap.Int64("leader-compact-revision", leaderHash.CompactRevision),
+			zap.Uint32("leader-hash", leaderHash.Hash),
+			zap.Uint32("peer-hash", k),
+			zap.String("peer-ids", v.String()),
+			zap.Bool("quorum-exist", quorumExist),
+		)
+	}
+
+	return true
+}
+
+func (cm *corruptionChecker) handleConsistentHash(hash mvcc.KeyValueHash, peersChecked, peerCnt int) bool {
+	if peersChecked == peerCnt {
+		cm.lg.Info("successfully checked hash on whole cluster",
+			zap.Int("number-of-peers-checked", peersChecked),
+			zap.Int64("revision", hash.Revision),
+			zap.Int64("compactRevision", hash.CompactRevision),
+		)
+		cm.mux.Lock()
+		if hash.Revision > cm.latestRevisionChecked {
+			cm.latestRevisionChecked = hash.Revision
+		}
+		cm.mux.Unlock()
+		return true
+	}
+	cm.lg.Warn("skipped revision in compaction hash check; was not able to check all peers",
+		zap.Int("number-of-peers-checked", peersChecked),
+		zap.Int("number-of-peers", peerCnt),
+		zap.Int64("revision", hash.Revision),
+		zap.Int64("compactRevision", hash.CompactRevision),
+	)
+	// The only case which needs to check next hash
+	return false
+}
+
 func (cm *corruptionChecker) uncheckedRevisions() []mvcc.KeyValueHash {
 	cm.mux.RLock()
 	lastRevisionChecked := cm.latestRevisionChecked

server/etcdserver/corrupt_test.go

@@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ func TestCompactHashCheck(t *testing.T) {
 				hashes:     []mvcc.KeyValueHash{{Revision: 1}, {Revision: 2}},
 				peerHashes: []*peerHashKVResp{{err: fmt.Errorf("failed getting hash")}},
 			},
-			expectActions: []string{"MemberId()", "ReqTimeout()", "Hashes()", "PeerHashByRev(2)", "PeerHashByRev(1)"},
+			expectActions: []string{"MemberId()", "ReqTimeout()", "Hashes()", "PeerHashByRev(2)", "MemberId()", "PeerHashByRev(1)", "MemberId()"},
 		},
 		{
 			name: "Peer returned different compaction revision is skipped",
@@ -259,15 +259,112 @@ func TestCompactHashCheck(t *testing.T) {
 				hashes:     []mvcc.KeyValueHash{{Revision: 1, CompactRevision: 1}, {Revision: 2, CompactRevision: 2}},
 				peerHashes: []*peerHashKVResp{{resp: &pb.HashKVResponse{CompactRevision: 3}}},
 			},
-			expectActions: []string{"MemberId()", "ReqTimeout()", "Hashes()", "PeerHashByRev(2)", "PeerHashByRev(1)"},
+			expectActions: []string{"MemberId()", "ReqTimeout()", "Hashes()", "PeerHashByRev(2)", "MemberId()", "PeerHashByRev(1)", "MemberId()"},
 		},
 		{
-			name: "Peer returned same compaction revision but different hash triggers alarm",
+			name: "Etcd can identify two corrupted members in 5 member cluster",
 			hasher: fakeHasher{
-				hashes:     []mvcc.KeyValueHash{{Revision: 1, CompactRevision: 1, Hash: 1}, {Revision: 2, CompactRevision: 1, Hash: 2}},
-				peerHashes: []*peerHashKVResp{{peerInfo: peerInfo{id: 42}, resp: &pb.HashKVResponse{CompactRevision: 1, Hash: 3}}},
+				hashes: []mvcc.KeyValueHash{{Revision: 1, CompactRevision: 1, Hash: 1}, {Revision: 2, CompactRevision: 1, Hash: 2}},
+				peerHashes: []*peerHashKVResp{
+					{peerInfo: peerInfo{id: 42}, resp: &pb.HashKVResponse{CompactRevision: 1, Hash: 2}},
+					{peerInfo: peerInfo{id: 43}, resp: &pb.HashKVResponse{CompactRevision: 1, Hash: 2}},
+					{peerInfo: peerInfo{id: 44}, resp: &pb.HashKVResponse{CompactRevision: 1, Hash: 7}},
+					{peerInfo: peerInfo{id: 45}, resp: &pb.HashKVResponse{CompactRevision: 1, Hash: 8}},
+				},
 			},
-			expectActions: []string{"MemberId()", "ReqTimeout()", "Hashes()", "PeerHashByRev(2)", "TriggerCorruptAlarm(42)"},
+			expectActions: []string{"MemberId()", "ReqTimeout()", "Hashes()", "PeerHashByRev(2)", "MemberId()", "TriggerCorruptAlarm(44)", "TriggerCorruptAlarm(45)"},
+			expectCorrupt: true,
+		},
+		{
+			name: "Etcd checks next hash when one member is unresponsive in 3 member cluster",
+			hasher: fakeHasher{
+				hashes: []mvcc.KeyValueHash{{Revision: 1, CompactRevision: 1, Hash: 2}, {Revision: 2, CompactRevision: 1, Hash: 2}},
+				peerHashes: []*peerHashKVResp{
+					{err: fmt.Errorf("failed getting hash")},
+					{peerInfo: peerInfo{id: 43}, resp: &pb.HashKVResponse{CompactRevision: 1, Hash: 2}},
+				},
+			},
+			expectActions: []string{"MemberId()", "ReqTimeout()", "Hashes()", "PeerHashByRev(2)", "MemberId()", "PeerHashByRev(1)", "MemberId()"},
+			expectCorrupt: false,
+		},
+		{
+			name: "Etcd can identify single corrupted member in 3 member cluster",
+			hasher: fakeHasher{
+				hashes: []mvcc.KeyValueHash{{Revision: 1, CompactRevision: 1, Hash: 2}, {Revision: 2, CompactRevision: 1, Hash: 2}},
+				peerHashes: []*peerHashKVResp{
+					{peerInfo: peerInfo{id: 42}, resp: &pb.HashKVResponse{CompactRevision: 1, Hash: 2}},
+					{peerInfo: peerInfo{id: 43}, resp: &pb.HashKVResponse{CompactRevision: 1, Hash: 3}},
+				},
+			},
+			expectActions: []string{"MemberId()", "ReqTimeout()", "Hashes()", "PeerHashByRev(2)", "MemberId()", "TriggerCorruptAlarm(43)"},
+			expectCorrupt: true,
+		},
+		{
+			name: "Etcd can identify single corrupted member in 5 member cluster",
+			hasher: fakeHasher{
+				hashes: []mvcc.KeyValueHash{{Revision: 1, CompactRevision: 1, Hash: 2}, {Revision: 2, CompactRevision: 1, Hash: 2}},
+				peerHashes: []*peerHashKVResp{
+					{peerInfo: peerInfo{id: 42}, resp: &pb.HashKVResponse{CompactRevision: 1, Hash: 2}},
+					{peerInfo: peerInfo{id: 43}, resp: &pb.HashKVResponse{CompactRevision: 1, Hash: 2}},
+					{peerInfo: peerInfo{id: 44}, resp: &pb.HashKVResponse{CompactRevision: 1, Hash: 3}},
+					{peerInfo: peerInfo{id: 45}, resp: &pb.HashKVResponse{CompactRevision: 1, Hash: 2}},
+				},
+			},
+			expectActions: []string{"MemberId()", "ReqTimeout()", "Hashes()", "PeerHashByRev(2)", "MemberId()", "TriggerCorruptAlarm(44)"},
+			expectCorrupt: true,
+		},
+		{
+			name: "Etcd triggers corrupted alarm on whole cluster if in 3 member cluster one member is down and one member corrupted",
+			hasher: fakeHasher{
+				hashes: []mvcc.KeyValueHash{{Revision: 1, CompactRevision: 1, Hash: 2}, {Revision: 2, CompactRevision: 1, Hash: 2}},
+				peerHashes: []*peerHashKVResp{
+					{err: fmt.Errorf("failed getting hash")},
+					{peerInfo: peerInfo{id: 43}, resp: &pb.HashKVResponse{CompactRevision: 1, Hash: 3}},
+				},
+			},
+			expectActions: []string{"MemberId()", "ReqTimeout()", "Hashes()", "PeerHashByRev(2)", "MemberId()", "TriggerCorruptAlarm(0)"},
+			expectCorrupt: true,
+		},
+		{
+			name: "Etcd triggers corrupted alarm on whole cluster if no quorum in 5 member cluster",
+			hasher: fakeHasher{
+				hashes: []mvcc.KeyValueHash{{Revision: 1, CompactRevision: 1, Hash: 1}, {Revision: 2, CompactRevision: 1, Hash: 2}},
+				peerHashes: []*peerHashKVResp{
+					{peerInfo: peerInfo{id: 42}, resp: &pb.HashKVResponse{CompactRevision: 1, Hash: 2}},
+					{peerInfo: peerInfo{id: 43}, resp: &pb.HashKVResponse{CompactRevision: 1, Hash: 3}},
+					{peerInfo: peerInfo{id: 44}, resp: &pb.HashKVResponse{CompactRevision: 1, Hash: 3}},
+					{peerInfo: peerInfo{id: 45}, resp: &pb.HashKVResponse{CompactRevision: 1, Hash: 3}},
+					{peerInfo: peerInfo{id: 46}, resp: &pb.HashKVResponse{CompactRevision: 1, Hash: 4}},
+					{peerInfo: peerInfo{id: 47}, resp: &pb.HashKVResponse{CompactRevision: 1, Hash: 2}},
+				},
+			},
+			expectActions: []string{"MemberId()", "ReqTimeout()", "Hashes()", "PeerHashByRev(2)", "MemberId()", "TriggerCorruptAlarm(0)"},
+			expectCorrupt: true,
+		},
+		{
+			name: "Etcd can identify corrupted member in 5 member cluster even if one member is down",
+			hasher: fakeHasher{
+				hashes: []mvcc.KeyValueHash{{Revision: 1, CompactRevision: 1, Hash: 2}, {Revision: 2, CompactRevision: 1, Hash: 2}},
+				peerHashes: []*peerHashKVResp{
+					{peerInfo: peerInfo{id: 42}, resp: &pb.HashKVResponse{CompactRevision: 1, Hash: 2}},
+					{err: fmt.Errorf("failed getting hash")},
+					{peerInfo: peerInfo{id: 44}, resp: &pb.HashKVResponse{CompactRevision: 1, Hash: 3}},
+					{peerInfo: peerInfo{id: 45}, resp: &pb.HashKVResponse{CompactRevision: 1, Hash: 2}},
+				},
+			},
+			expectActions: []string{"MemberId()", "ReqTimeout()", "Hashes()", "PeerHashByRev(2)", "MemberId()", "TriggerCorruptAlarm(44)"},
+			expectCorrupt: true,
+		},
+		{
+			name: "Etcd can identify that leader is corrupted",
+			hasher: fakeHasher{
+				hashes: []mvcc.KeyValueHash{{Revision: 1, CompactRevision: 1, Hash: 2}, {Revision: 2, CompactRevision: 1, Hash: 2}},
+				peerHashes: []*peerHashKVResp{
+					{peerInfo: peerInfo{id: 42}, resp: &pb.HashKVResponse{CompactRevision: 1, Hash: 3}},
+					{peerInfo: peerInfo{id: 43}, resp: &pb.HashKVResponse{CompactRevision: 1, Hash: 3}},
+				},
+			},
+			expectActions: []string{"MemberId()", "ReqTimeout()", "Hashes()", "PeerHashByRev(2)", "MemberId()", "TriggerCorruptAlarm(1)"},
 			expectCorrupt: true,
 		},
 		{
@@ -276,7 +373,7 @@ func TestCompactHashCheck(t *testing.T) {
 				hashes:     []mvcc.KeyValueHash{{Revision: 1, CompactRevision: 1, Hash: 1}, {Revision: 2, CompactRevision: 1, Hash: 1}},
 				peerHashes: []*peerHashKVResp{{resp: &pb.HashKVResponse{Header: &pb.ResponseHeader{MemberId: 42}, CompactRevision: 1, Hash: 1}}},
 			},
-			expectActions:             []string{"MemberId()", "ReqTimeout()", "Hashes()", "PeerHashByRev(2)"},
+			expectActions:             []string{"MemberId()", "ReqTimeout()", "Hashes()", "PeerHashByRev(2)", "MemberId()"},
 			expectLastRevisionChecked: 2,
 		},
 		{
@@ -288,7 +385,7 @@ func TestCompactHashCheck(t *testing.T) {
 					{err: fmt.Errorf("failed getting hash")},
 				},
 			},
-			expectActions: []string{"MemberId()", "ReqTimeout()", "Hashes()", "PeerHashByRev(1)"},
+			expectActions: []string{"MemberId()", "ReqTimeout()", "Hashes()", "PeerHashByRev(1)", "MemberId()"},
 		},
 	}
 	for _, tc := range tcs {

tests/integration/corrupt_test.go

@@ -93,30 +93,13 @@ func TestPeriodicCheckDetectsCorruption(t *testing.T) {
 	time.Sleep(50 * time.Millisecond)
 	leader := clus.WaitLeader(t)
 
-	// Get sorted member IDs
-	members, err := cc.MemberList(ctx)
-	assert.NoError(t, err, "error on member list %v")
-
-	// NOTE: If the corrupted member has been elected as leader, the
-	// alarm will show the smaller member.
-	var expectedID = uint64(clus.Members[0].ID())
-	if leader == 0 {
-		for _, m := range members.Members {
-			if m.Name != clus.Members[0].Name {
-				expectedID = m.ID
-				break
-			}
-		}
-
-	}
-
 	err = clus.Members[leader].Server.CorruptionChecker().PeriodicCheck()
 	assert.NoError(t, err, "error on periodic check")
 	time.Sleep(50 * time.Millisecond)
 
 	alarmResponse, err := cc.AlarmList(ctx)
 	assert.NoError(t, err, "error on alarm list")
-	assert.Equal(t, []*etcdserverpb.AlarmMember{{Alarm: etcdserverpb.AlarmType_CORRUPT, MemberID: expectedID}}, alarmResponse.Alarms)
+	assert.Equal(t, []*etcdserverpb.AlarmMember{{Alarm: etcdserverpb.AlarmType_CORRUPT, MemberID: uint64(clus.Members[0].ID())}}, alarmResponse.Alarms)
 }
 
 func TestCompactHashCheck(t *testing.T) {
@@ -186,26 +169,64 @@ func TestCompactHashCheckDetectCorruption(t *testing.T) {
 	time.Sleep(50 * time.Millisecond)
 	leader := clus.WaitLeader(t)
 
-	// Get sorted member IDs
-	members, err := cc.MemberList(ctx)
-	assert.NoError(t, err, "error on member list %v")
+	clus.Members[leader].Server.CorruptionChecker().CompactHashCheck()
+	time.Sleep(50 * time.Millisecond)
+	alarmResponse, err := cc.AlarmList(ctx)
+	assert.NoError(t, err, "error on alarm list")
+	assert.Equal(t, []*etcdserverpb.AlarmMember{{Alarm: etcdserverpb.AlarmType_CORRUPT, MemberID: uint64(clus.Members[0].ID())}}, alarmResponse.Alarms)
+}
 
-	// NOTE: If the corrupted member has been elected as leader, the
-	// alarm will show the smaller member.
-	var expectedID = uint64(clus.Members[0].ID())
-	if leader == 0 {
-		for _, m := range members.Members {
-			if m.Name != clus.Members[0].Name {
-				expectedID = m.ID
-				break
-			}
-		}
+func TestCompactHashCheckDetectMultipleCorruption(t *testing.T) {
+	integration.BeforeTest(t)
 
+	clus := integration.NewCluster(t, &integration.ClusterConfig{Size: 5})
+	defer clus.Terminate(t)
+
+	cc, err := clus.ClusterClient(t)
+	require.NoError(t, err)
+
+	ctx := context.Background()
+
+	for i := 0; i < 10; i++ {
+		_, err := cc.Put(ctx, testutil.PickKey(int64(i)), fmt.Sprint(i))
+		assert.NoError(t, err, "error on put")
 	}
 
+	clus.Members[0].Server.CorruptionChecker().CompactHashCheck()
+	clus.Members[0].Stop(t)
+	clus.Members[1].Server.CorruptionChecker().CompactHashCheck()
+	clus.Members[1].Stop(t)
+	clus.WaitLeader(t)
+
+	err = testutil.CorruptBBolt(clus.Members[0].BackendPath())
+	require.NoError(t, err)
+	err = testutil.CorruptBBolt(clus.Members[1].BackendPath())
+	require.NoError(t, err)
+
+	err = clus.Members[0].Restart(t)
+	require.NoError(t, err)
+	err = clus.Members[1].Restart(t)
+	require.NoError(t, err)
+
+	_, err = cc.Compact(ctx, 5)
+	require.NoError(t, err)
+	time.Sleep(50 * time.Millisecond)
+	leader := clus.WaitLeader(t)
+
 	clus.Members[leader].Server.CorruptionChecker().CompactHashCheck()
 	time.Sleep(50 * time.Millisecond)
 	alarmResponse, err := cc.AlarmList(ctx)
 	assert.NoError(t, err, "error on alarm list")
-	assert.Equal(t, []*etcdserverpb.AlarmMember{{Alarm: etcdserverpb.AlarmType_CORRUPT, MemberID: expectedID}}, alarmResponse.Alarms)
+
+	expectedAlarmMap := map[uint64]etcdserverpb.AlarmType{
+		uint64(clus.Members[0].ID()): etcdserverpb.AlarmType_CORRUPT,
+		uint64(clus.Members[1].ID()): etcdserverpb.AlarmType_CORRUPT,
+	}
+
+	actualAlarmMap := make(map[uint64]etcdserverpb.AlarmType)
+	for _, alarm := range alarmResponse.Alarms {
+		actualAlarmMap[alarm.MemberID] = alarm.Alarm
+	}
+
+	require.Equal(t, expectedAlarmMap, actualAlarmMap)
 }