Co-authored-by: Martin Weindel <martin.weindel@sap.com>
Co-authored-by: Jingyi Hu <jingyih@google.com>
Co-authored-by: Liming Liu <andyliuliming@outlook.com>
Trying to decouple the v2 client from SRV code. Can't move
into discovery/ since that creates a circular dependency. So,
give up and move all the SRV code into a new package.
Fix https://github.com/coreos/etcd/issues/7512.
If a server starts and aborts due to config error,
it is possible to get stuck in ReadyNotify waits.
This adds select case to get notified on stop channel.
Signed-off-by: Gyu-Ho Lee <gyuhox@gmail.com>
This commit adds jwt token support in v3 auth API.
Remaining major ToDos:
- Currently token type isn't hidden from etcdserver. In the near
future the information should be completely invisible from
etcdserver package.
- Configurable expiration of token. Currently tokens can be valid
until keys are changed.
How to use:
1. generate keys for signing and verfying jwt tokens:
$ openssl genrsa -out app.rsa 1024
$ openssl rsa -in app.rsa -pubout > app.rsa.pub
2. add command line options to etcd like below:
--auth-token-type jwt \
--auth-jwt-pub-key app.rsa.pub --auth-jwt-priv-key app.rsa \
--auth-jwt-sign-method RS512
3. launch etcd cluster
Below is a performance comparison of serializable read w/ and w/o jwt
token. Every (3) etcd node is executed on a single machine. Signing
method is RS512 and key length is 1024 bit. As the results show, jwt
based token introduces a performance overhead but it would be
acceptable for a case that requires authentication.
w/o jwt token auth (no auth):
Summary:
Total: 1.6172 secs.
Slowest: 0.0125 secs.
Fastest: 0.0001 secs.
Average: 0.0002 secs.
Stddev: 0.0004 secs.
Requests/sec: 6183.5877
Response time histogram:
0.000 [1] |
0.001 [9982] |∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎
0.003 [1] |
0.004 [1] |
0.005 [0] |
0.006 [0] |
0.008 [6] |
0.009 [0] |
0.010 [1] |
0.011 [5] |
0.013 [3] |
Latency distribution:
10% in 0.0001 secs.
25% in 0.0001 secs.
50% in 0.0001 secs.
75% in 0.0001 secs.
90% in 0.0002 secs.
95% in 0.0002 secs.
99% in 0.0003 secs.
w/ jwt token auth:
Summary:
Total: 2.5364 secs.
Slowest: 0.0182 secs.
Fastest: 0.0002 secs.
Average: 0.0003 secs.
Stddev: 0.0005 secs.
Requests/sec: 3942.5185
Response time histogram:
0.000 [1] |
0.002 [9975] |∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎∎
0.004 [0] |
0.006 [1] |
0.007 [11] |
0.009 [2] |
0.011 [4] |
0.013 [5] |
0.015 [0] |
0.016 [0] |
0.018 [1] |
Latency distribution:
10% in 0.0002 secs.
25% in 0.0002 secs.
50% in 0.0002 secs.
75% in 0.0002 secs.
90% in 0.0003 secs.
95% in 0.0003 secs.
99% in 0.0004 secs.
Keep more wal entries in memory for fast follower recovery.
10,000 was a too small number that triggers quite a few snapshots.
ZK proves that 100,000 is a reasonable number for even old less prowerful
machines.
Eventually we should provide both count and max memory (for large entries).
Bump go-systemd to v14 (48702e0d, 2016-11-14).
Also adjust caller of daemon.SdNotify() to avoid build error, which can
be seen especially when running "go get github.com/coreos/etcd".
When using the embed functionality, you can't call the Server.Stop()
function until StartEtcd returns, which can block until there is a call
to Server.Stop() in error situations. Since we have a catch-22, the
ReadyNotify() can be called manually by the user if they wish to wait
for the server startup, or in parallel with a timeout if they wish to
cancel it after some time.
Chzz pointed out that this is also more consistent with the
etcdserver.Start() behaviour too.
purpleidea pointed out that this is actually more correct too, because
we can now register the stop interrupt handler before we block on
startup.
