No need of separate function to filter duplicates.
Just merge ranges in-place
```
go test -v -run=xxx -bench=BenchmarkMergeOld -benchmem
BenchmarkMergeOld-8 100000 13524 ns/op 1104 B/op 8 allocs/op
go test -v -run=xxx -bench=BenchmarkMergeNew -benchmem
BenchmarkMergeNew-8 100000 13432 ns/op 936 B/op 3 allocs/op
```
Not much performance boost, but less memory allocation
and simpler
Because of my own silly mistake, current NewAuthStore() doesn't
initialize authStore in a correct manner. For example, after recovery
from snapshot, it cannot revive the flag of enabled/disabled. This
commit fixes the problem.
Fix https://github.com/coreos/etcd/issues/7165
The cost of bcrypt password checking is quite high (almost 100ms on a
modern machine) so executing it in apply loop will be
problematic. This commit exclude the checking mechanism to the API
layer. The password checking is validated with the OCC like way
similar to the auth of serializable get.
This commit also removes a unit test of Authenticate RPC from
auth/store_test.go. It is because the RPC now accepts an auth request
unconditionally and delegates the checking functionality to
authStore.CheckPassword() (so a unit test for CheckPassword() is
added). The combination of the two functionalities can be tested by
e2e (e.g. TestCtlV3AuthWriteKey).
Fixes https://github.com/coreos/etcd/issues/6530
Test 15, counting from zero, in TestGetMergedPerms
in etcd/auth/range_perm_cache_test.go, was trying
incorrectly assert that [a, b) merged with [b, "")
should be [a, b). Added a test specifically for
this. This patch fixes the incorrect larger test
and the bugs in the code that it was hiding.
Fixes#6359
This commit introduces revision of authStore. The revision number
represents a version of authStore that is incremented by updating auth
related information.
The revision is required for avoiding TOCTOU problems. Currently there
are two types of the TOCTOU problems in v3 auth.
The first one is in ordinal linearizable requests with a sequence like
below ():
1. Request from client CA is processed in follower FA. FA looks up the
username (let it U) for the request from a token of the request. At
this time, the request is authorized correctly.
2. Another request from client CB is processed in follower FB. CB
is for changing U's password.
3. FB forwards the request from CB to the leader before FA. Now U's
password is updated and the request from CA should be rejected.
4. However, the request from CA is processed by the leader because
authentication is already done in FA.
For avoiding the above sequence, this commit lets
etcdserverpb.RequestHeader have a member revision. The member is
initialized during authentication by followers and checked in a
leader. If the revision in RequestHeader is lower than the leader's
authStore revision, it means a sequence like above happened. In such a
case, the state machine returns auth.ErrAuthRevisionObsolete. The
error code lets nodes retry their requests.
The second one, a case of serializable range and txn, is more
subtle. Because these requests are processed in follower directly. The
TOCTOU problem can be caused by a sequence like below:
1. Serializable request from client CA is processed in follower FA. At
first, FA looks up the username (let it U) and its permission
before actual access to KV.
2. Another request from client CB is processed in follower FB and
forwarded to the leader. The cluster including FA now commits a log
entry of the request from CB. Assume the request changed the
permission or password of U.
3. Now the serializable request from CA is accessing to KV. Even if
the access is allowed at the point of 1, now it can be invalid
because of the change introduced in 2.
For avoiding the above sequence, this commit lets the functions of
serializable requests (EtcdServer.Range() and EtcdServer.Txn())
compare the revision in the request header with the latest revision of
authStore after the actual access. If the saved revision is lower than
the latest one, it means the permission can be changed. Although it
would introduce false positives (e.g. changing other user's password),
it prevents the TOCTOU problem. This idea is an implementation of
Anthony's comment:
https://github.com/coreos/etcd/pull/5739#issuecomment-228128254
This commit expands RPCs for getting user and role and support list up
all users and roles. etcdctl v3 is now support getting all users and
roles with the newly added option --all e.g. etcdctl user get --all
Currently auth tokens are generated in the replicated state machine
layer randomly. It means one auth token generated in node A cannot be
used for node B. It is problematic for load balancing and fail
over. This commit moves the token generation logic from the state
machine to API layer (before raft) and let all nodes share a single
token.
Log index of Raft is also added to a token for ensuring uniqueness of
the token and detecting activation of the token in the cluster (some
nodes can receive the token before generating and installing the token
in its state machine).
This commit also lets authStore have simple token related things. It
is required because of unit test. The test requires cleaning of the
state of the simple token things after one test (succeeding test can
create duplicated token and it causes panic).
