advance() should use rs.req.Entries[0].Data as the context instead of
req.Context for deletion. Since req.Context is never set, there won't be
any context being deleted from pendingReadIndex; results mem leak.
FIXES#7571
The "logs converge" case in TestLeaderElectionPreVote was incorrectly
passing because some nodes were not actually using the preVoteConfig.
This test case was more complex than its siblings and it was not
verifying what it wanted to verify, so pull it out into a separate test
where everything can be tested more explicitly.
Fixes#6895
If MsgTimeoutNow arrived after a node was removed, the node could start
and win an election, then panic in becomeLeader (see
cockroachdb/cockroach#8535)
Move all vote handling from the per-state step functions to the
top-level Step(). This wasn't necessary before because MsgVote would
cause us to become a follower, but MsgPreVote needs to be handled
without changing the node's current state.
Some tests were starting nodes with a non-empty log but a term of zero,
which cannot happen in the real world. This was affecting the final term
being tested in TestLeaderElection.
Previously, the checkQuorum flag required an election timeout to
expire before a node could cast its first vote. This change permits
the node to cast a vote at any time when the leader is not known,
including immediately after startup.
Follower has already set its leader ID from
previous append messages from the leader, but
to be consistent, this adds a line to set its
leader id from leader snapshot message.
removeNode reduces the required quorum size, so some pending entries may
be able to commit after it is applied.
Discovered in cockroachdb/cockroach#3642
We need to be able to force an election (on one node) after creating a
new group (cockroachdb/cockroach#1384), but it is difficult to ensure
that our call to Campaign does not race with an election that may be
started by raft itself. A redundant call to Campaign should be a no-op
instead of a panic. (But the panic in becomeCandidate remains, because
we don't want to update the term or change the committed index in this
case)
