During review of: https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/pull/12988 spotted
that PUT is actially writing to v3-backend.
If we are replaying WAL log, it might happened that backend's
applied_index is > than the WAL's log entry. In such situation we should
skip applying on backend V3.
I think both the methods (setVersion, setMembersAttributes) are in
practice idempotent so its not that 'serious' problem, but for
formal correctness adding the proper checks.
ClusterVersionSet, ClusterMemberAttrSet, DowngradeInfoSet functions are
writing both to V2store and backend. Prior this CL there were
in a branch not executed if shouldApplyV3 was false,
e.g. during restore when Backend is up-to-date (has high
consistency-index) while v2store requires replay from WAL log.
The most serious consequence of this bug was that v2store after restore
could have different index (revision) than the same exact store before restore,
so potentially different content between replicas.
Also this change is supressing double-applying of Membership
(ClusterConfig) changes on Backend (store v3) - that lackilly are not
part of MVCC/KeyValue store, so they didn't caused Revisions to be
bumped.
Inspired by jingyih@ comment:
https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/pull/12820#issuecomment-815299406
