When snapshot store requests raft snapshot from etcdserver apply loop,
it may block on the channel for some time, or wait some time for KV to
snapshot. This is unexpected because raft state machine should be unblocked.
Even worse, this block may lead to deadlock:
1. raft state machine waits on getting snapshot from raft memory storage
2. raft memory storage waits snapshot store to get snapshot
3. snapshot store requests raft snapshot from apply loop
4. apply loop is applying entries, and waits raftNode loop to finish
messages sending
5. raftNode loop waits peer loop in Transport to send out messages
6. peer loop in Transport waits for raft state machine to process message
Fix it by changing the logic of getSnap to be asynchronously creation.
Use snapshotSender to send v3 snapshot message. It puts raft snapshot
message and v3 snapshot into request body, then sends it to the target peer.
When it receives http.StatusNoContent, it knows the message has been
received and processed successfully.
As receiver, snapHandler saves v3 snapshot and then processes the raft snapshot
message, then respond with http.StatusNoContent.
rafthttp has different requirements for connections created by the
transport for different usage, and this is hard to achieve when giving
one http.RoundTripper. Pass into pkg the data needed to build transport
now, and let rafthttp build its own transports.
time.AfterFunc() creates its own goroutine and calls the callback
function in the goroutine. It can cause datarace like the problem
fixed in the commit de1a16e0f107c4e1ffcc7128f7f343baf9631e30 . This
commit also fixes the potential dataraces of tests in
etcdserver/server_test.go .
This fixes the problem that proposal cannot be applied.
When start the etcdserver.run loop, it expects to get the latest
existing snapshot. It should not attempt to request one because the loop
is the entity to create the snapshot.
When using Snapshot function, it is expected:
1. know the size of snapshot before writing data
2. split snapshot-ready phase and write-data phase. so we could cut
snapshot first and write data later.
Update its interface to fit the requirement of etcdserver.
Before this PR, it always prints nil because cluster info has not been
covered when print:
```
2015-10-02 14:00:24.353631 I | etcdserver: loaded cluster information
from store: <nil>
```
snapshotStore is the store of snapshot, and it supports to get latest snapshot
and save incoming snapshot.
raftStorage supports to get latest snapshot when v3demo is open.
Before this PR, the log is
```
2015/09/1 13:18:31 etcdmain: client: etcd cluster is unavailable or
misconfigured
```
It is quite hard for people to understand what happens.
Now we print out the exact reason for the failure, and explains the way
to handle it.
Like the commit 6974fc63ed87, this commit lets etcdserver forbid
removing started member if quorum cannot be preserved after
reconfiguration if the option -strict-reconfig-check is passed to
etcd. The removal can cause deadlock if unstarted members have wrong
peer URLs.
After enabling v3 demo, it may change the underlying data organization
for v3 store. So we forbid to unset --experimental-v3demo once it has
been used.
I found some grammatical errors in comments.
This pull request was submitted https://github.com/coreos/etcd/pull/3513.
I am resubmitting following the correct guidlines.
Current membership changing functionality of etcd seems to have a
problem which can cause deadlock.
How to produce:
1. construct N node cluster
2. add N new nodes with etcdctl member add, without starting the new members
What happens:
After finishing add N nodes, a total number of the cluster becomes 2 *
N and a quorum number of the cluster becomes N + 1. It means
membership change requires at least N + 1 nodes because Raft treats
membership information in its log like other ordinal log append
requests.
Assume the peer URLs of the added nodes are wrong because of miss
operation or bugs in wrapping program which launch etcd. In such a
case, both of adding and removing members are impossible because the
quorum isn't preserved. Of course ordinal requests cannot be
served. The cluster would seem to be deadlock.
Of course, the best practice of adding new nodes is adding one node
and let the node start one by one. However, the effect of this problem
is so serious. I think preventing the problem forcibly would be
valuable.
Solution:
This patch lets etcd forbid adding a new node if the operation changes
quorum and the number of changed quorum is larger than a number of
running nodes. If etcd is launched with a newly added option
-strict-reconfig-check, the checking logic is activated. If the option
isn't passed, default behavior of reconfig is kept.
Fixes https://github.com/coreos/etcd/issues/3477
