[RES-65] Add a test for BoundedMergeDepth - new (#1131)

* Test bounded merge depth

* Fix a bug in GetBlockInfo, where trying to use reachability on an invalid block

* Add a test to reproduce and test the GetBlockInfo bug
This commit is contained in:
Elichai Turkel 2020-11-25 13:42:55 +02:00 committed by GitHub
parent 0fa13357c3
commit f9c2137344
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
3 changed files with 331 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -124,6 +124,11 @@ func (s *consensus) GetBlockInfo(blockHash *externalapi.DomainHash) (*externalap
}
blockInfo.BlockStatus = blockStatus
// If the status is invalid, then we don't have the necessary reachability data to check if it's in PruningPoint.Future.
if blockStatus == externalapi.StatusInvalid {
return blockInfo, nil
}
isBlockInHeaderPruningPointFuture, err := s.syncManager.IsBlockInHeaderPruningPointFuture(blockHash)
if err != nil {
return nil, err

View File

@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
package consensus
import (
"github.com/kaspanet/kaspad/domain/consensus/model/externalapi"
"github.com/kaspanet/kaspad/domain/consensus/ruleerrors"
"github.com/kaspanet/kaspad/domain/consensus/utils/consensusserialization"
"github.com/kaspanet/kaspad/domain/consensus/utils/testutils"
"github.com/kaspanet/kaspad/domain/dagconfig"
"github.com/pkg/errors"
"testing"
)
func TestConsensus_GetBlockInfo(t *testing.T) {
testutils.ForAllNets(t, true, func(t *testing.T, params *dagconfig.Params) {
factory := NewFactory()
consensus, teardown, err := factory.NewTestConsensus(params, "TestConsensus_GetBlockInfo")
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("Error setting up consensus: %+v", err)
}
defer teardown()
invalidBlock, err := consensus.BuildBlockWithParents([]*externalapi.DomainHash{params.GenesisHash}, nil, nil)
if err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
invalidBlock.Header.TimeInMilliseconds = 0
err = consensus.ValidateAndInsertBlock(invalidBlock)
if !errors.Is(err, ruleerrors.ErrTimeTooOld) {
t.Fatalf("Expected block to be invalid with err: %v, instead found: %v", ruleerrors.ErrTimeTooOld, err)
}
info, err := consensus.GetBlockInfo(consensusserialization.BlockHash(invalidBlock))
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("Failed to get block info: %v", err)
}
if !info.Exists {
t.Fatal("The block is missing")
}
if info.BlockStatus != externalapi.StatusInvalid {
t.Fatalf("Expected block status: %s, instead got: %s", externalapi.StatusInvalid, info.BlockStatus)
}
if info.IsBlockInHeaderPruningPointFuture != false {
t.Fatalf("Expected IsBlockInHeaderPruningPointFuture=false, instead found: %t", info.IsBlockInHeaderPruningPointFuture)
}
emptyCoinbase := externalapi.DomainCoinbaseData{}
validBlock, err := consensus.BuildBlock(&emptyCoinbase, nil)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("consensus.BuildBlock with an empty coinbase shouldn't fail: %v", err)
}
err = consensus.ValidateAndInsertBlock(validBlock)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("consensus.ValidateAndInsertBlock with a block straight from consensus.BuildBlock should not fail: %v", err)
}
info, err = consensus.GetBlockInfo(consensusserialization.BlockHash(validBlock))
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("Failed to get block info: %v", err)
}
if !info.Exists {
t.Fatal("The block is missing")
}
if info.BlockStatus != externalapi.StatusValid {
t.Fatalf("Expected block status: %s, instead got: %s", externalapi.StatusValid, info.BlockStatus)
}
if info.IsBlockInHeaderPruningPointFuture != true {
t.Fatalf("Expected IsBlockInHeaderPruningPointFuture=true, instead found: %t", info.IsBlockInHeaderPruningPointFuture)
}
})
}

View File

@ -1,11 +1,16 @@
package consensus
import (
"github.com/kaspanet/kaspad/domain/consensus/model"
"github.com/kaspanet/kaspad/domain/consensus/model/externalapi"
"github.com/kaspanet/kaspad/domain/consensus/model/testapi"
"github.com/kaspanet/kaspad/domain/consensus/ruleerrors"
"github.com/kaspanet/kaspad/domain/consensus/utils/consensusserialization"
"github.com/kaspanet/kaspad/domain/consensus/utils/testutils"
"github.com/kaspanet/kaspad/domain/dagconfig"
"github.com/pkg/errors"
"fmt"
"testing"
)
@ -167,3 +172,249 @@ func TestFinality(t *testing.T) {
}
})
}
func TestBoundedMergeDepth(t *testing.T) {
testutils.ForAllNets(t, true, func(t *testing.T, params *dagconfig.Params) {
// Set finalityInterval to 50 blocks, so that test runs quickly
params.FinalityDuration = 50 * params.TargetTimePerBlock
finalityInterval := int(params.FinalityDepth())
if int(params.K) >= finalityInterval {
t.Fatal("K must be smaller than finality duration for this test to run")
}
checkViolatingMergeDepth := func(consensus testapi.TestConsensus, parents []*externalapi.DomainHash) (*externalapi.DomainBlock, bool) {
block, err := consensus.BuildBlockWithParents(parents, nil, nil)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("TestBoundedMergeDepth: BuildBlockWithParents failed: %v", err)
return nil, false // fo some reason go doesn't recognize that t.Fatalf never returns
}
err = consensus.ValidateAndInsertBlock(block)
if err == nil {
return block, false
} else if errors.Is(err, ruleerrors.ErrViolatingBoundedMergeDepth) {
return block, true
} else {
t.Fatalf("TestBoundedMergeDepth: expected err: %v, found err: %v", ruleerrors.ErrViolatingBoundedMergeDepth, err)
return nil, false // fo some reason go doesn't recognize that t.Fatalf never returns
}
}
processBlock := func(consensus testapi.TestConsensus, block *externalapi.DomainBlock, name string) {
err := consensus.ValidateAndInsertBlock(block)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("TestBoundedMergeDepth: %s got unexpected error from ProcessBlock: %+v", name, err)
}
}
buildAndInsertBlock := func(consensus testapi.TestConsensus, parentHashes []*externalapi.DomainHash) *externalapi.DomainBlock {
block, err := consensus.BuildBlockWithParents(parentHashes, nil, nil)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("TestBoundedMergeDepth: Failed building block: %v", err)
}
err = consensus.ValidateAndInsertBlock(block)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("TestBoundedMergeDepth: Failed Inserting block to consensus: %v", err)
}
return block
}
getStatus := func(consensus testapi.TestConsensus, block *externalapi.DomainBlock) externalapi.BlockStatus {
blockInfo, err := consensus.GetBlockInfo(consensusserialization.BlockHash(block))
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("TestBoundedMergeDepth: Failed to get block info: %v", err)
} else if !blockInfo.Exists {
t.Fatalf("TestBoundedMergeDepth: Failed to get block info, block doesn't exists")
}
return blockInfo.BlockStatus
}
factory := NewFactory()
consensusBuild, teardownFunc1, err := factory.NewTestConsensus(params, "BoundedMergeTestBuild")
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("TestBoundedMergeDepth: Error setting up consensus: %+v", err)
}
consensusReal, teardownFunc2, err := factory.NewTestConsensus(params, "BoundedMergeTestReal")
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("TestBoundedMergeDepth: Error setting up consensus: %+v", err)
}
defer teardownFunc2()
// Create a block on top on genesis
block1 := buildAndInsertBlock(consensusBuild, []*externalapi.DomainHash{params.GenesisHash})
// Create a chain
selectedChain := make([]*externalapi.DomainBlock, 0, finalityInterval+1)
parent := consensusserialization.BlockHash(block1)
// Make sure this is always bigger than `blocksChain2` so it will stay the selected chain
for i := 0; i < finalityInterval+2; i++ {
block := buildAndInsertBlock(consensusBuild, []*externalapi.DomainHash{parent})
selectedChain = append(selectedChain, block)
parent = consensusserialization.BlockHash(block)
}
// Create another chain
blocksChain2 := make([]*externalapi.DomainBlock, 0, finalityInterval+1)
parent = consensusserialization.BlockHash(block1)
for i := 0; i < finalityInterval+1; i++ {
block := buildAndInsertBlock(consensusBuild, []*externalapi.DomainHash{parent})
blocksChain2 = append(blocksChain2, block)
parent = consensusserialization.BlockHash(block)
}
// Teardown and assign nil to make sure we use the right DAG from here on.
teardownFunc1()
consensusBuild = nil
// Now test against the real DAG
// submit block1
processBlock(consensusReal, block1, "block1")
// submit chain1
for i, block := range selectedChain {
processBlock(consensusReal, block, fmt.Sprintf("selectedChain block No %d", i))
}
// submit chain2
for i, block := range blocksChain2 {
processBlock(consensusReal, block, fmt.Sprintf("blocksChain2 block No %d", i))
}
// submit a block pointing at tip(chain1) and on first block in chain2 directly
mergeDepthViolatingBlockBottom, isViolatingMergeDepth := checkViolatingMergeDepth(consensusReal, []*externalapi.DomainHash{consensusserialization.BlockHash(blocksChain2[0]), consensusserialization.BlockHash(selectedChain[len(selectedChain)-1])})
if !isViolatingMergeDepth {
t.Fatalf("TestBoundedMergeDepth: Expected mergeDepthViolatingBlockBottom to violate merge depth")
}
// submit a block pointing at tip(chain1) and tip(chain2) should also obviously violate merge depth (this points at first block in chain2 indirectly)
mergeDepthViolatingTop, isViolatingMergeDepth := checkViolatingMergeDepth(consensusReal, []*externalapi.DomainHash{consensusserialization.BlockHash(blocksChain2[len(blocksChain2)-1]), consensusserialization.BlockHash(selectedChain[len(selectedChain)-1])})
if !isViolatingMergeDepth {
t.Fatalf("TestBoundedMergeDepth: Expected mergeDepthViolatingTop to violate merge depth")
}
// the location of the parents in the slices need to be both `-X` so the `selectedChain` one will have higher blueScore (it's a chain longer by 1)
kosherizingBlock, isViolatingMergeDepth := checkViolatingMergeDepth(consensusReal, []*externalapi.DomainHash{consensusserialization.BlockHash(blocksChain2[len(blocksChain2)-3]), consensusserialization.BlockHash(selectedChain[len(selectedChain)-3])})
kosherizingBlockHash := consensusserialization.BlockHash(kosherizingBlock)
if isViolatingMergeDepth {
t.Fatalf("TestBoundedMergeDepth: Expected blueKosherizingBlock to not violate merge depth")
}
virtualGhotDagData, err := consensusReal.GHOSTDAGDataStore().Get(consensusReal.DatabaseContext(), model.VirtualBlockHash)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("TestBoundedMergeDepth: Failed getting the ghostdag data of the virtual: %v", err)
}
// Make sure it's actually blue
found := false
for _, blue := range virtualGhotDagData.MergeSetBlues {
if *blue == *kosherizingBlockHash {
found = true
break
}
}
if !found {
t.Fatalf("TestBoundedMergeDepth: Expected kosherizingBlock to be blue by the virtual")
}
pointAtBlueKosherizing, isViolatingMergeDepth := checkViolatingMergeDepth(consensusReal, []*externalapi.DomainHash{kosherizingBlockHash, consensusserialization.BlockHash(selectedChain[len(selectedChain)-1])})
if isViolatingMergeDepth {
t.Fatalf("TestBoundedMergeDepth: Expected selectedTip to not violate merge depth")
}
virtualSelectedParent, err := consensusReal.GetVirtualSelectedParent()
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("TestBoundedMergeDepth: Failed getting the virtual selected parent %v", err)
}
if *consensusserialization.BlockHash(virtualSelectedParent) != *consensusserialization.BlockHash(pointAtBlueKosherizing) {
t.Fatalf("TestBoundedMergeDepth: Expected %s to be the selectedTip but found %s instead", consensusserialization.BlockHash(pointAtBlueKosherizing), consensusserialization.BlockHash(virtualSelectedParent))
}
// Now let's make the kosherizing block red and try to merge again
tip := consensusserialization.BlockHash(selectedChain[len(selectedChain)-1])
// we use k-1 because `kosherizingBlock` points at tip-2, so 2+k-1 = k+1 anticone.
for i := 0; i < int(params.K)-1; i++ {
block := buildAndInsertBlock(consensusReal, []*externalapi.DomainHash{tip})
tip = consensusserialization.BlockHash(block)
}
virtualSelectedParent, err = consensusReal.GetVirtualSelectedParent()
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("TestBoundedMergeDepth: Failed getting the virtual selected parent %v", err)
}
if *consensusserialization.BlockHash(virtualSelectedParent) != *tip {
t.Fatalf("TestBoundedMergeDepth: Expected %s to be the selectedTip but found %s instead", tip, consensusserialization.BlockHash(virtualSelectedParent))
}
virtualGhotDagData, err = consensusReal.GHOSTDAGDataStore().Get(consensusReal.DatabaseContext(), model.VirtualBlockHash)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("TestBoundedMergeDepth: Failed getting the ghostdag data of the virtual: %v", err)
}
// Make sure it's actually blue
found = false
for _, blue := range virtualGhotDagData.MergeSetBlues {
if *blue == *kosherizingBlockHash {
found = true
break
}
}
if found {
t.Fatalf("expected kosherizingBlock to be red by the virtual")
}
pointAtRedKosherizing, isViolatingMergeDepth := checkViolatingMergeDepth(consensusReal, []*externalapi.DomainHash{kosherizingBlockHash, tip})
if !isViolatingMergeDepth {
t.Fatalf("TestBoundedMergeDepth: Expected selectedTipRedKosherize to violate merge depth")
}
// Now `pointAtBlueKosherizing` itself is actually still blue, so we can still point at that even though we can't point at kosherizing directly anymore
transitiveBlueKosherizing, isViolatingMergeDepth := checkViolatingMergeDepth(consensusReal, []*externalapi.DomainHash{consensusserialization.BlockHash(pointAtBlueKosherizing), tip})
if isViolatingMergeDepth {
t.Fatalf("TestBoundedMergeDepth: Expected transitiveBlueKosherizing to not violate merge depth")
}
virtualSelectedParent, err = consensusReal.GetVirtualSelectedParent()
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("TestBoundedMergeDepth: Failed getting the virtual selected parent %v", err)
}
if *consensusserialization.BlockHash(virtualSelectedParent) != *consensusserialization.BlockHash(transitiveBlueKosherizing) {
t.Fatalf("TestBoundedMergeDepth: Expected %s to be the selectedTip but found %s instead", consensusserialization.BlockHash(transitiveBlueKosherizing), consensusserialization.BlockHash(virtualSelectedParent))
}
// Lets validate the status of all the interesting blocks
if getStatus(consensusReal, pointAtBlueKosherizing) != externalapi.StatusValid {
t.Fatalf("TestBoundedMergeDepth: pointAtBlueKosherizing expected status '%s' but got '%s'", externalapi.StatusValid, getStatus(consensusReal, pointAtBlueKosherizing))
}
if getStatus(consensusReal, pointAtRedKosherizing) != externalapi.StatusInvalid {
t.Fatalf("TestBoundedMergeDepth: pointAtRedKosherizing expected status '%s' but got '%s'", externalapi.StatusInvalid, getStatus(consensusReal, pointAtRedKosherizing))
}
if getStatus(consensusReal, transitiveBlueKosherizing) != externalapi.StatusValid {
t.Fatalf("TestBoundedMergeDepth: transitiveBlueKosherizing expected status '%s' but got '%s'", externalapi.StatusValid, getStatus(consensusReal, transitiveBlueKosherizing))
}
if getStatus(consensusReal, mergeDepthViolatingBlockBottom) != externalapi.StatusInvalid {
t.Fatalf("TestBoundedMergeDepth: mergeDepthViolatingBlockBottom expected status '%s' but got '%s'", externalapi.StatusInvalid, getStatus(consensusReal, mergeDepthViolatingBlockBottom))
}
if getStatus(consensusReal, mergeDepthViolatingTop) != externalapi.StatusInvalid {
t.Fatalf("TestBoundedMergeDepth: mergeDepthViolatingTop expected status '%s' but got '%s'", externalapi.StatusInvalid, getStatus(consensusReal, mergeDepthViolatingTop))
}
if getStatus(consensusReal, kosherizingBlock) != externalapi.StatusUTXOPendingVerification {
t.Fatalf("kosherizingBlock expected status '%s' but got '%s'", externalapi.StatusUTXOPendingVerification, getStatus(consensusReal, kosherizingBlock))
}
for i, b := range blocksChain2 {
if getStatus(consensusReal, b) != externalapi.StatusUTXOPendingVerification {
t.Fatalf("blocksChain2[%d] expected status '%s' but got '%s'", i, externalapi.StatusUTXOPendingVerification, getStatus(consensusReal, b))
}
}
for i, b := range selectedChain {
if getStatus(consensusReal, b) != externalapi.StatusValid {
t.Fatalf("selectedChain[%d] expected status '%s' but got '%s'", i, externalapi.StatusValid, getStatus(consensusReal, b))
}
}
})
}