kaspad/blockdag/reachability_test.go
Ori Newman 2174a0a7f2 [NOD-497] Implement GHOSTDAG (#575)
* [NOD-540] Implement reachability (#545)

* [NOD-540] Begin implementing reachability.

* [NOD-540] Finish implementing reachability.

* [NOD-540] Implement TestIsFutureBlock.

* [NOD-540] Implement TestInsertFutureBlock.

* [NOD-540] Add comments.

* [NOD-540] Add comment for interval in blockNode.

* [NOD-540] Updated comments over insertFutureBlock and isFutureBlock.

* [NOD-540] Implement interval splitting methods.

* [NOD-540] Begin implementing tree manipulation in blockNode.

* [NOD-540] Implement countSubtreesUp.

* [NOD-540] Add a comment explaining an impossible condition.

* [NOD-540] Implement applyIntervalDown.

* [NOD-540] Moved the reachability tree stuff into reachability.go.

* [NOD-540] Add some comments.

* [NOD-540] Add more comments, implement isInPast.

* [NOD-540] Fix comments.

* [NOD-540] Implement TestSplitFraction.

* [NOD-540] Implement TestSplitExact.

* [NOD-540] Implement TestSplit.

* [NOD-540] Add comments to structs.

* [NOD-540] Implement TestAddTreeChild.

* [NOD-540] Fix a comment.

* [NOD-540] Rename isInPast to isAncestorOf.

* [NOD-540] Rename futureBlocks to futureCoveringSet.

* [NOD-540] Rename isFutureBlock to isInFuture.

* [NOD-540] move reachabilityInterval to the top of reachability.go.

* [NOD-540] Change "s.t." to "such that" in a comment.

* [NOD-540] Fix indentation.

* [NOD-540] Fix a potential bug involving float inaccuracy.

* [NOD-540] Wrote a more descriptive error message.

* [NOD-540] Fix error messsage.

* [NOD-540] Fix the recursive countSubtreesUp.

* [NOD-540] Rename countSubtreesUp to countSubtrees and applyIntervalDown to propagateInterval.

* [NOD-540] Implement updating reachability for a valid new block.

* [NOD-540] Implement a disk storage for reachability data.

* [NOD-540] Fix not all tree nodes being written to the database.

* [NOD-540] Implement serialization for reachabilityData.

* [NOD-540] Implement some deserialization for reachabilityData.

* [NOD-540] Implement restoring the reachabilityStore on node restart.

* [NOD-540] Made interval and remainingInterval pointers.

* [NOD-540] Rename setTreeInterval to setInterval.

* [NOD-540] Rename reindexTreeIntervals to reindexIntervals and fixed the comment above it.

* [NOD-540] Expand the comment above reindexIntervals.

* [NOD-540] Fix comment above countSubtrees.

* [NOD-540] Fix comment above countSubtrees some more.

* [NOD-540] Fix comment above split.

* [NOD-540] Fix comment above isAncestorOf.

* [NOD-540] Fix comment above reachabilityTreeNode.

* [NOD-540] Fix weird condition in addTreeChild.

* [NOD-540] Rename addTreeChild to addChild.

* [NOD-540] Fix weird condition in splitFraction.

* [NOD-540] Reverse the lines in reachabilityTreeNode.String().

* [NOD-540] Renamed f to fraction and x to size.

* [NOD-540] Fix comment above bisect.

* [NOD-540] Implement rtn.isAncestorOf().

* [NOD-540] Use treeNode isAncestorOf instead of treeInterval isAncestorOf.

* [NOD-540] Use newReachabilityInterval instead of struct initialization.

* [NOD-540] Make reachabilityTreeNode.String() use strings.Join.

* [NOD-540] Use sync.RWMutex instead of locks.PriorityMutex.

* [NOD-540] Rename thisTreeNode to newTreeNode.

* [NOD-540] Rename setTreeNode to addTreeNode.

* [NOD-540] Extracted selectedParentAnticone to a separate function.

* [NOD-540] Rename node to this.

* [NOD-540] Move updateReachability and isAncestorOf from dag.go to reachability.go.

* [NOD-540] Add whitespace after multiline function signatures in reachability.go.

* [NOD-540] Make splitFraction return an error on empty interval.

* [NOD-540] Add a comment about rounding to splitFraction.

* [NOD-540] Replace sneaky tabs with spaces.

* [NOD-540] Rename split to splitExponential.

* [NOD-540] Extract exponentialFractions to a separate function.

* [NOD-540] Rename bisect to findIndex.

* [NOD-540] Add call to reachabilityStore.clearDirtyEntries at the end of saveChangesFromBlock.

* [NOD-540] Explain the dirty hack in reachabilityStore.init().

* [NOD-540] Split the function signature for deserializeReachabilityData to two lines.

* [NOD-540] Add a comment about float precision loss to exponentialFractions.

* [NOD-540] Corrected a comment about float precision loss to exponentialFractions.

* [NOD-540] Fixed a comment about float precision loss to exponentialFractions some more.

* [NOD-540] Added further comments above futureCoveringBlockSet.

* [NOD-540] Rename addTreeNode to setTreeNode.

* [NOD-540] Rename splitExponential to splitWithExponentialBias.

* [NOD-540] Fix object references in reachabilityData deserialization (#563)

* [NOD-540] Fix broken references in deserialization.

* [NOD-540] Fix broken references in futureCoveringSet deserialization. Also add comments.

* [NOD-540] Don't deserialize on the first pass in reachabilityStore.init().

* [NOD-540] Remove redundant assignment to loaded[hash].

* [NOD-540] Use NewHash instead of SetBytes. Rename data to destination.

* [NOD-540] Preallocate futureCoveringSet.

* [NOD-541] Implement GHOSTDAG (#560)

* [NOD-541] Implement GHOSTDAG

* [NOD-541] Replace the old PHANTOM variant with GHOSTDAG

* [NOD-541] Move dag.updateReachability to the top of dag.applyDAGChanges to update reachability before the virtual block is updated

* [NOD-541] Fix blueAnticoneSize

* [NOD-541] Initialize node.bluesAnticoneSizes

* [NOD-541] Fix pastUTXO and applyBlueBlocks blues order

* [NOD-541] Add serialization logic to node.bluesAnticoneSizes

* [NOD-541] Fix GHOSTDAG to not count the new block and the blue candidates anticone, add selected parent to blues, and save to node.bluesAnticoneSizes properly

* [NOD-541] Fix test names in inner strings

* [NOD-541] Writing TestGHOSTDAG

* [NOD-541] In blueAnticoneSize change node->current

* [NOD-541] name ghostdag return values

* [NOD-541] fix ghostdag to return slice

* [NOD-541] Split k-cluster violation rules

* [NOD-541] Add missing space

* [NOD-541] Add comment to ghostdag

* [NOD-541] In selectedParentAnticone rename past->selectedParentPast

* [NOD-541] Fix misrefernces to TestChainUpdates

* [NOD-541] Fix ghostdag comment

* [NOD-541] Make PrepareBlockForTest in blockdag package

* [NOD-541] Make PrepareBlockForTest in blockdag package

* [NOD-541] Assign to selectedParentAnticone[i] instead of appending

* [NOD-541] Remove redundant forceTransactions arguments from PrepareBlockForTEST

* [NOD-541] Add non-selected parents to anticoneHeap

* [NOD-541] add test for ghostdag

* [NOD-541] Add comments

* [NOD-541] Use adjusted time for initializing blockNode

* [NOD-541] Rename isAncestorOf -> isAncestorOfBlueCandidate

* [NOD-541] Remove params from PrepareBlockForTest

* [NOD-541] Fix TestChainHeight

* [NOD-541] Remove recursive lock

* [NOD-541] Fix TestTxIndexConnectBlock

* [NOD-541] Fix TestBlueBlockWindow

* [NOD-541] Put prepareAndProcessBlock in common_test.go

* [NOD-541] Fix TestConfirmations

* [NOD-541] Fix TestAcceptingBlock

* [NOD-541] Fix TestDifficulty

* [NOD-541] Fix TestVirtualBlock

* [NOD-541] Fix TestSelectedPath

* [NOD-541] Fix TestChainUpdates

* [NOD-541] Shorten TestDifficulty test time

* [NOD-541] Make PrepareBlockForTest use minimal valid block time

* [NOD-541] Remove TODO comment

* [NOD-541] Move blockdag related mining functions to mining.go

* [NOD-541] Use NextBlockCoinbaseTransaction instead of NextBlockCoinbaseTransactionNoLock in NextCoinbaseFromAddress

* [NOD-541] Remove useMinimalTime from BlockForMining

* [NOD-541] Make MedianAdjustedTime a *BlockDAG method

* [NOD-541] Fix ghostdag to use anticone slice instead of heap

* [NOD-541] Fix NewBlockTemplate locks

* [NOD-541] Fix ghostdag comments

* [NOD-541] Convert MedianAdjustedTime to NextBlockTime

* [NOD-541] Fix ghostdag comment

* [NOD-541] Fix TestGHOSTDAG comment

* [NOD-541] Add comment before sanity check

* [NOD-541] Explicitly initialize .blues in ghostdag

* [NOD-541] Rename *blockNode.lessThan to *blockNode.less

* [NOD-541] Remove redundant check if block != chainBlock

* [NOD-541] Fix comment

* [NOD-541] Fix comment

* [NOD-497] Add comment; General refactoring

* [NOD-497] General refactoring.

* [NOD-497] Use isAncestor of the tree rather than the node

* [NOD-497] Remove reachability mutex lock as it is redundant (dag lock is held so no need); General refactoring.

* [NOD-497] Update comment

* [NOD-497] Undo test blocktimestamp

* [NOD-497] Update comments; Use BlockNode.less for blockset;

* [NOD-497] Change processBlock to return boolean and not the delay duration (merge conflict)

* [NOD-497] Undo change for bluest to use less; Change blocknode less to use daghash.Less

Co-authored-by: stasatdaglabs <39559713+stasatdaglabs@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Dan Aharoni <dereeno@protonmail.com>
2020-01-08 17:41:22 +02:00

476 lines
16 KiB
Go

package blockdag
import (
"reflect"
"testing"
)
func TestAddChild(t *testing.T) {
// Scenario 1: test addChild in a chain
// root -> a -> b -> c...
// Create the root node of a new reachability tree
root := newReachabilityTreeNode(&blockNode{})
root.setInterval(newReachabilityInterval(1, 100))
// Add a chain of child nodes just before a reindex occurs (2^6=64 < 100)
currentTip := root
for i := 0; i < 6; i++ {
node := newReachabilityTreeNode(&blockNode{})
modifiedNodes, err := currentTip.addChild(node)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("TestAddChild: addChild failed: %s", err)
}
// Expect only the node and its parent to be affected
expectedModifiedNodes := []*reachabilityTreeNode{currentTip, node}
if !reflect.DeepEqual(modifiedNodes, expectedModifiedNodes) {
t.Fatalf("TestAddChild: unexpected modifiedNodes. "+
"want: %s, got: %s", expectedModifiedNodes, modifiedNodes)
}
currentTip = node
}
// Add another node to the tip of the chain to trigger a reindex (100 < 2^7=128)
lastChild := newReachabilityTreeNode(&blockNode{})
modifiedNodes, err := currentTip.addChild(lastChild)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("TestAddChild: addChild failed: %s", err)
}
// Expect more than just the node and its parent to be modified but not
// all the nodes
if len(modifiedNodes) <= 2 && len(modifiedNodes) >= 7 {
t.Fatalf("TestAddChild: unexpected amount of modifiedNodes.")
}
// Expect the tip to have an interval of 1 and remaining interval of 0
tipInterval := lastChild.interval.size()
if tipInterval != 1 {
t.Fatalf("TestAddChild: unexpected tip interval size: want: 1, got: %d", tipInterval)
}
tipRemainingInterval := lastChild.remainingInterval.size()
if tipRemainingInterval != 0 {
t.Fatalf("TestAddChild: unexpected tip interval size: want: 0, got: %d", tipRemainingInterval)
}
// Expect all nodes to be descendant nodes of root
currentNode := currentTip
for currentNode != nil {
if !root.isAncestorOf(currentNode) {
t.Fatalf("TestAddChild: currentNode is not a descendant of root")
}
currentNode = currentNode.parent
}
// Scenario 2: test addChild where all nodes are direct descendants of root
// root -> a, b, c...
// Create the root node of a new reachability tree
root = newReachabilityTreeNode(&blockNode{})
root.setInterval(newReachabilityInterval(1, 100))
// Add child nodes to root just before a reindex occurs (2^6=64 < 100)
childNodes := make([]*reachabilityTreeNode, 6)
for i := 0; i < len(childNodes); i++ {
childNodes[i] = newReachabilityTreeNode(&blockNode{})
modifiedNodes, err := root.addChild(childNodes[i])
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("TestAddChild: addChild failed: %s", err)
}
// Expect only the node and the root to be affected
expectedModifiedNodes := []*reachabilityTreeNode{root, childNodes[i]}
if !reflect.DeepEqual(modifiedNodes, expectedModifiedNodes) {
t.Fatalf("TestAddChild: unexpected modifiedNodes. "+
"want: %s, got: %s", expectedModifiedNodes, modifiedNodes)
}
}
// Add another node to the root to trigger a reindex (100 < 2^7=128)
lastChild = newReachabilityTreeNode(&blockNode{})
modifiedNodes, err = root.addChild(lastChild)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("TestAddChild: addChild failed: %s", err)
}
// Expect more than just the node and the root to be modified but not
// all the nodes
if len(modifiedNodes) <= 2 && len(modifiedNodes) >= 7 {
t.Fatalf("TestAddChild: unexpected amount of modifiedNodes.")
}
// Expect the last-added child to have an interval of 1 and remaining interval of 0
lastChildInterval := lastChild.interval.size()
if lastChildInterval != 1 {
t.Fatalf("TestAddChild: unexpected lastChild interval size: want: 1, got: %d", lastChildInterval)
}
lastChildRemainingInterval := lastChild.remainingInterval.size()
if lastChildRemainingInterval != 0 {
t.Fatalf("TestAddChild: unexpected lastChild interval size: want: 0, got: %d", lastChildRemainingInterval)
}
// Expect all nodes to be descendant nodes of root
for _, childNode := range childNodes {
if !root.isAncestorOf(childNode) {
t.Fatalf("TestAddChild: childNode is not a descendant of root")
}
}
}
func TestSplitFraction(t *testing.T) {
tests := []struct {
interval *reachabilityInterval
fraction float64
expectedLeft *reachabilityInterval
expectedRight *reachabilityInterval
}{
{
interval: newReachabilityInterval(1, 100),
fraction: 0.5,
expectedLeft: newReachabilityInterval(1, 50),
expectedRight: newReachabilityInterval(51, 100),
},
{
interval: newReachabilityInterval(2, 100),
fraction: 0.5,
expectedLeft: newReachabilityInterval(2, 51),
expectedRight: newReachabilityInterval(52, 100),
},
{
interval: newReachabilityInterval(1, 99),
fraction: 0.5,
expectedLeft: newReachabilityInterval(1, 50),
expectedRight: newReachabilityInterval(51, 99),
},
{
interval: newReachabilityInterval(1, 100),
fraction: 0.2,
expectedLeft: newReachabilityInterval(1, 20),
expectedRight: newReachabilityInterval(21, 100),
},
{
interval: newReachabilityInterval(1, 100),
fraction: 0,
expectedLeft: newReachabilityInterval(1, 0),
expectedRight: newReachabilityInterval(1, 100),
},
{
interval: newReachabilityInterval(1, 100),
fraction: 1,
expectedLeft: newReachabilityInterval(1, 100),
expectedRight: newReachabilityInterval(101, 100),
},
}
for i, test := range tests {
left, right, err := test.interval.splitFraction(test.fraction)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("TestSplitFraction: splitFraction unexpectedly failed in test #%d: %s", i, err)
}
if !reflect.DeepEqual(left, test.expectedLeft) {
t.Errorf("TestSplitFraction: unexpected left in test #%d. "+
"want: %s, got: %s", i, test.expectedLeft, left)
}
if !reflect.DeepEqual(right, test.expectedRight) {
t.Errorf("TestSplitFraction: unexpected right in test #%d. "+
"want: %s, got: %s", i, test.expectedRight, right)
}
}
}
func TestSplitExact(t *testing.T) {
tests := []struct {
interval *reachabilityInterval
sizes []uint64
expectedIntervals []*reachabilityInterval
}{
{
interval: newReachabilityInterval(1, 100),
sizes: []uint64{100},
expectedIntervals: []*reachabilityInterval{
newReachabilityInterval(1, 100),
},
},
{
interval: newReachabilityInterval(1, 100),
sizes: []uint64{50, 50},
expectedIntervals: []*reachabilityInterval{
newReachabilityInterval(1, 50),
newReachabilityInterval(51, 100),
},
},
{
interval: newReachabilityInterval(1, 100),
sizes: []uint64{10, 20, 30, 40},
expectedIntervals: []*reachabilityInterval{
newReachabilityInterval(1, 10),
newReachabilityInterval(11, 30),
newReachabilityInterval(31, 60),
newReachabilityInterval(61, 100),
},
},
{
interval: newReachabilityInterval(1, 100),
sizes: []uint64{0, 100},
expectedIntervals: []*reachabilityInterval{
newReachabilityInterval(1, 0),
newReachabilityInterval(1, 100),
},
},
{
interval: newReachabilityInterval(1, 100),
sizes: []uint64{100, 0},
expectedIntervals: []*reachabilityInterval{
newReachabilityInterval(1, 100),
newReachabilityInterval(101, 100),
},
},
}
for i, test := range tests {
intervals, err := test.interval.splitExact(test.sizes)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("TestSplitExact: splitExact unexpectedly failed in test #%d: %s", i, err)
}
if !reflect.DeepEqual(intervals, test.expectedIntervals) {
t.Errorf("TestSplitExact: unexpected intervals in test #%d. "+
"want: %s, got: %s", i, test.expectedIntervals, intervals)
}
}
}
func TestSplitWithExponentialBias(t *testing.T) {
tests := []struct {
interval *reachabilityInterval
sizes []uint64
expectedIntervals []*reachabilityInterval
}{
{
interval: newReachabilityInterval(1, 100),
sizes: []uint64{100},
expectedIntervals: []*reachabilityInterval{
newReachabilityInterval(1, 100),
},
},
{
interval: newReachabilityInterval(1, 100),
sizes: []uint64{50, 50},
expectedIntervals: []*reachabilityInterval{
newReachabilityInterval(1, 50),
newReachabilityInterval(51, 100),
},
},
{
interval: newReachabilityInterval(1, 100),
sizes: []uint64{10, 20, 30, 40},
expectedIntervals: []*reachabilityInterval{
newReachabilityInterval(1, 10),
newReachabilityInterval(11, 30),
newReachabilityInterval(31, 60),
newReachabilityInterval(61, 100),
},
},
{
interval: newReachabilityInterval(1, 100),
sizes: []uint64{25, 25},
expectedIntervals: []*reachabilityInterval{
newReachabilityInterval(1, 50),
newReachabilityInterval(51, 100),
},
},
{
interval: newReachabilityInterval(1, 100),
sizes: []uint64{1, 1},
expectedIntervals: []*reachabilityInterval{
newReachabilityInterval(1, 50),
newReachabilityInterval(51, 100),
},
},
{
interval: newReachabilityInterval(1, 100),
sizes: []uint64{33, 33, 33},
expectedIntervals: []*reachabilityInterval{
newReachabilityInterval(1, 33),
newReachabilityInterval(34, 66),
newReachabilityInterval(67, 100),
},
},
{
interval: newReachabilityInterval(1, 100),
sizes: []uint64{10, 15, 25},
expectedIntervals: []*reachabilityInterval{
newReachabilityInterval(1, 10),
newReachabilityInterval(11, 25),
newReachabilityInterval(26, 100),
},
},
{
interval: newReachabilityInterval(1, 100),
sizes: []uint64{25, 15, 10},
expectedIntervals: []*reachabilityInterval{
newReachabilityInterval(1, 75),
newReachabilityInterval(76, 90),
newReachabilityInterval(91, 100),
},
},
{
interval: newReachabilityInterval(1, 10_000),
sizes: []uint64{10, 10, 20},
expectedIntervals: []*reachabilityInterval{
newReachabilityInterval(1, 20),
newReachabilityInterval(21, 40),
newReachabilityInterval(41, 10_000),
},
},
}
for i, test := range tests {
intervals, err := test.interval.splitWithExponentialBias(test.sizes)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("TestSplitWithExponentialBias: splitWithExponentialBias unexpectedly failed in test #%d: %s", i, err)
}
if !reflect.DeepEqual(intervals, test.expectedIntervals) {
t.Errorf("TestSplitWithExponentialBias: unexpected intervals in test #%d. "+
"want: %s, got: %s", i, test.expectedIntervals, intervals)
}
}
}
func TestIsInFuture(t *testing.T) {
blocks := futureCoveringBlockSet{
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(2, 3)}},
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(4, 67)}},
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(67, 77)}},
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(657, 789)}},
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(1000, 1000)}},
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(1920, 1921)}},
}
tests := []struct {
block *futureCoveringBlock
expectedResult bool
}{
{
block: &futureCoveringBlock{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(1, 1)}},
expectedResult: false,
},
{
block: &futureCoveringBlock{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(5, 7)}},
expectedResult: true,
},
{
block: &futureCoveringBlock{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(67, 76)}},
expectedResult: true,
},
{
block: &futureCoveringBlock{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(78, 100)}},
expectedResult: false,
},
{
block: &futureCoveringBlock{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(1980, 2000)}},
expectedResult: false,
},
{
block: &futureCoveringBlock{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(1920, 1920)}},
expectedResult: true,
},
}
for i, test := range tests {
result := blocks.isInFuture(test.block)
if result != test.expectedResult {
t.Errorf("TestIsInFuture: unexpected result in test #%d. Want: %t, got: %t",
i, test.expectedResult, result)
}
}
}
func TestInsertBlock(t *testing.T) {
blocks := futureCoveringBlockSet{
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(1, 3)}},
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(4, 67)}},
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(67, 77)}},
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(657, 789)}},
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(1000, 1000)}},
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(1920, 1921)}},
}
tests := []struct {
toInsert []*futureCoveringBlock
expectedResult futureCoveringBlockSet
}{
{
toInsert: []*futureCoveringBlock{
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(5, 7)}},
},
expectedResult: futureCoveringBlockSet{
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(1, 3)}},
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(4, 67)}},
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(67, 77)}},
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(657, 789)}},
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(1000, 1000)}},
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(1920, 1921)}},
},
},
{
toInsert: []*futureCoveringBlock{
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(65, 78)}},
},
expectedResult: futureCoveringBlockSet{
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(1, 3)}},
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(4, 67)}},
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(65, 78)}},
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(657, 789)}},
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(1000, 1000)}},
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(1920, 1921)}},
},
},
{
toInsert: []*futureCoveringBlock{
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(88, 97)}},
},
expectedResult: futureCoveringBlockSet{
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(1, 3)}},
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(4, 67)}},
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(67, 77)}},
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(88, 97)}},
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(657, 789)}},
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(1000, 1000)}},
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(1920, 1921)}},
},
},
{
toInsert: []*futureCoveringBlock{
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(88, 97)}},
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(3000, 3010)}},
},
expectedResult: futureCoveringBlockSet{
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(1, 3)}},
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(4, 67)}},
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(67, 77)}},
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(88, 97)}},
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(657, 789)}},
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(1000, 1000)}},
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(1920, 1921)}},
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(3000, 3010)}},
},
},
}
for i, test := range tests {
// Create a clone of blocks so that we have a clean start for every test
blocksClone := make(futureCoveringBlockSet, len(blocks))
for i, block := range blocks {
blocksClone[i] = block
}
for _, block := range test.toInsert {
blocksClone.insertBlock(block)
}
if !reflect.DeepEqual(blocksClone, test.expectedResult) {
t.Errorf("TestInsertBlock: unexpected result in test #%d. Want: %s, got: %s",
i, test.expectedResult, blocksClone)
}
}
}