mirror of
https://github.com/kaspanet/kaspad.git
synced 2025-09-13 13:00:10 +00:00
51ff9e2562
* [NOD-571] Cover reachabilityInterval split methods. * [NOD-571] Cover reindexInterval. * [NOD-571] Cover reachability String() methods. * [NOD-571] Cover blueAnticoneSize. * [NOD-571] Remove unnecessary error from setTreeNode. * [NOD-571] Add TestGHOSTDAGErrors. * [NOD-571] Use PrepareBlockForTest in TestBlueAnticoneSizeErrors. * [NOD-571] Use PrepareBlockForTest in TestGHOSTDAGErrors. * [NOD-571] Add substring checks to TestSplitFractionErrors. * [NOD-571] Add substring checks to TestSplitExactErrors and TestSplitWithExponentialBiasErrors. * [NOD-571] Add comments to TestReindexIntervalErrors. * [NOD-571] Add additional info in some error messages. * [NOD-571] Fix error messages.
649 lines
22 KiB
Go
649 lines
22 KiB
Go
package blockdag
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
"reflect"
|
|
"strings"
|
|
"testing"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
func TestAddChild(t *testing.T) {
|
|
// Scenario 1: test addChild in a chain
|
|
// root -> a -> b -> c...
|
|
// Create the root node of a new reachability tree
|
|
root := newReachabilityTreeNode(&blockNode{})
|
|
root.setInterval(newReachabilityInterval(1, 100))
|
|
|
|
// Add a chain of child nodes just before a reindex occurs (2^6=64 < 100)
|
|
currentTip := root
|
|
for i := 0; i < 6; i++ {
|
|
node := newReachabilityTreeNode(&blockNode{})
|
|
modifiedNodes, err := currentTip.addChild(node)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("TestAddChild: addChild failed: %s", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Expect only the node and its parent to be affected
|
|
expectedModifiedNodes := []*reachabilityTreeNode{currentTip, node}
|
|
if !reflect.DeepEqual(modifiedNodes, expectedModifiedNodes) {
|
|
t.Fatalf("TestAddChild: unexpected modifiedNodes. "+
|
|
"want: %s, got: %s", expectedModifiedNodes, modifiedNodes)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
currentTip = node
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Add another node to the tip of the chain to trigger a reindex (100 < 2^7=128)
|
|
lastChild := newReachabilityTreeNode(&blockNode{})
|
|
modifiedNodes, err := currentTip.addChild(lastChild)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("TestAddChild: addChild failed: %s", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Expect more than just the node and its parent to be modified but not
|
|
// all the nodes
|
|
if len(modifiedNodes) <= 2 && len(modifiedNodes) >= 7 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("TestAddChild: unexpected amount of modifiedNodes.")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Expect the tip to have an interval of 1 and remaining interval of 0
|
|
tipInterval := lastChild.interval.size()
|
|
if tipInterval != 1 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("TestAddChild: unexpected tip interval size: want: 1, got: %d", tipInterval)
|
|
}
|
|
tipRemainingInterval := lastChild.remainingInterval.size()
|
|
if tipRemainingInterval != 0 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("TestAddChild: unexpected tip interval size: want: 0, got: %d", tipRemainingInterval)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Expect all nodes to be descendant nodes of root
|
|
currentNode := currentTip
|
|
for currentNode != nil {
|
|
if !root.isAncestorOf(currentNode) {
|
|
t.Fatalf("TestAddChild: currentNode is not a descendant of root")
|
|
}
|
|
currentNode = currentNode.parent
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Scenario 2: test addChild where all nodes are direct descendants of root
|
|
// root -> a, b, c...
|
|
// Create the root node of a new reachability tree
|
|
root = newReachabilityTreeNode(&blockNode{})
|
|
root.setInterval(newReachabilityInterval(1, 100))
|
|
|
|
// Add child nodes to root just before a reindex occurs (2^6=64 < 100)
|
|
childNodes := make([]*reachabilityTreeNode, 6)
|
|
for i := 0; i < len(childNodes); i++ {
|
|
childNodes[i] = newReachabilityTreeNode(&blockNode{})
|
|
modifiedNodes, err := root.addChild(childNodes[i])
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("TestAddChild: addChild failed: %s", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Expect only the node and the root to be affected
|
|
expectedModifiedNodes := []*reachabilityTreeNode{root, childNodes[i]}
|
|
if !reflect.DeepEqual(modifiedNodes, expectedModifiedNodes) {
|
|
t.Fatalf("TestAddChild: unexpected modifiedNodes. "+
|
|
"want: %s, got: %s", expectedModifiedNodes, modifiedNodes)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Add another node to the root to trigger a reindex (100 < 2^7=128)
|
|
lastChild = newReachabilityTreeNode(&blockNode{})
|
|
modifiedNodes, err = root.addChild(lastChild)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("TestAddChild: addChild failed: %s", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Expect more than just the node and the root to be modified but not
|
|
// all the nodes
|
|
if len(modifiedNodes) <= 2 && len(modifiedNodes) >= 7 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("TestAddChild: unexpected amount of modifiedNodes.")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Expect the last-added child to have an interval of 1 and remaining interval of 0
|
|
lastChildInterval := lastChild.interval.size()
|
|
if lastChildInterval != 1 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("TestAddChild: unexpected lastChild interval size: want: 1, got: %d", lastChildInterval)
|
|
}
|
|
lastChildRemainingInterval := lastChild.remainingInterval.size()
|
|
if lastChildRemainingInterval != 0 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("TestAddChild: unexpected lastChild interval size: want: 0, got: %d", lastChildRemainingInterval)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Expect all nodes to be descendant nodes of root
|
|
for _, childNode := range childNodes {
|
|
if !root.isAncestorOf(childNode) {
|
|
t.Fatalf("TestAddChild: childNode is not a descendant of root")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestSplitFraction(t *testing.T) {
|
|
tests := []struct {
|
|
interval *reachabilityInterval
|
|
fraction float64
|
|
expectedLeft *reachabilityInterval
|
|
expectedRight *reachabilityInterval
|
|
}{
|
|
{
|
|
interval: newReachabilityInterval(1, 100),
|
|
fraction: 0.5,
|
|
expectedLeft: newReachabilityInterval(1, 50),
|
|
expectedRight: newReachabilityInterval(51, 100),
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
interval: newReachabilityInterval(2, 100),
|
|
fraction: 0.5,
|
|
expectedLeft: newReachabilityInterval(2, 51),
|
|
expectedRight: newReachabilityInterval(52, 100),
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
interval: newReachabilityInterval(1, 99),
|
|
fraction: 0.5,
|
|
expectedLeft: newReachabilityInterval(1, 50),
|
|
expectedRight: newReachabilityInterval(51, 99),
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
interval: newReachabilityInterval(1, 100),
|
|
fraction: 0.2,
|
|
expectedLeft: newReachabilityInterval(1, 20),
|
|
expectedRight: newReachabilityInterval(21, 100),
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
interval: newReachabilityInterval(1, 100),
|
|
fraction: 0,
|
|
expectedLeft: newReachabilityInterval(1, 0),
|
|
expectedRight: newReachabilityInterval(1, 100),
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
interval: newReachabilityInterval(1, 100),
|
|
fraction: 1,
|
|
expectedLeft: newReachabilityInterval(1, 100),
|
|
expectedRight: newReachabilityInterval(101, 100),
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for i, test := range tests {
|
|
left, right, err := test.interval.splitFraction(test.fraction)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("TestSplitFraction: splitFraction unexpectedly failed in test #%d: %s", i, err)
|
|
}
|
|
if !reflect.DeepEqual(left, test.expectedLeft) {
|
|
t.Errorf("TestSplitFraction: unexpected left in test #%d. "+
|
|
"want: %s, got: %s", i, test.expectedLeft, left)
|
|
}
|
|
if !reflect.DeepEqual(right, test.expectedRight) {
|
|
t.Errorf("TestSplitFraction: unexpected right in test #%d. "+
|
|
"want: %s, got: %s", i, test.expectedRight, right)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestSplitExact(t *testing.T) {
|
|
tests := []struct {
|
|
interval *reachabilityInterval
|
|
sizes []uint64
|
|
expectedIntervals []*reachabilityInterval
|
|
}{
|
|
{
|
|
interval: newReachabilityInterval(1, 100),
|
|
sizes: []uint64{100},
|
|
expectedIntervals: []*reachabilityInterval{
|
|
newReachabilityInterval(1, 100),
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
interval: newReachabilityInterval(1, 100),
|
|
sizes: []uint64{50, 50},
|
|
expectedIntervals: []*reachabilityInterval{
|
|
newReachabilityInterval(1, 50),
|
|
newReachabilityInterval(51, 100),
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
interval: newReachabilityInterval(1, 100),
|
|
sizes: []uint64{10, 20, 30, 40},
|
|
expectedIntervals: []*reachabilityInterval{
|
|
newReachabilityInterval(1, 10),
|
|
newReachabilityInterval(11, 30),
|
|
newReachabilityInterval(31, 60),
|
|
newReachabilityInterval(61, 100),
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
interval: newReachabilityInterval(1, 100),
|
|
sizes: []uint64{0, 100},
|
|
expectedIntervals: []*reachabilityInterval{
|
|
newReachabilityInterval(1, 0),
|
|
newReachabilityInterval(1, 100),
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
interval: newReachabilityInterval(1, 100),
|
|
sizes: []uint64{100, 0},
|
|
expectedIntervals: []*reachabilityInterval{
|
|
newReachabilityInterval(1, 100),
|
|
newReachabilityInterval(101, 100),
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for i, test := range tests {
|
|
intervals, err := test.interval.splitExact(test.sizes)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("TestSplitExact: splitExact unexpectedly failed in test #%d: %s", i, err)
|
|
}
|
|
if !reflect.DeepEqual(intervals, test.expectedIntervals) {
|
|
t.Errorf("TestSplitExact: unexpected intervals in test #%d. "+
|
|
"want: %s, got: %s", i, test.expectedIntervals, intervals)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestSplitWithExponentialBias(t *testing.T) {
|
|
tests := []struct {
|
|
interval *reachabilityInterval
|
|
sizes []uint64
|
|
expectedIntervals []*reachabilityInterval
|
|
}{
|
|
{
|
|
interval: newReachabilityInterval(1, 100),
|
|
sizes: []uint64{100},
|
|
expectedIntervals: []*reachabilityInterval{
|
|
newReachabilityInterval(1, 100),
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
interval: newReachabilityInterval(1, 100),
|
|
sizes: []uint64{50, 50},
|
|
expectedIntervals: []*reachabilityInterval{
|
|
newReachabilityInterval(1, 50),
|
|
newReachabilityInterval(51, 100),
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
interval: newReachabilityInterval(1, 100),
|
|
sizes: []uint64{10, 20, 30, 40},
|
|
expectedIntervals: []*reachabilityInterval{
|
|
newReachabilityInterval(1, 10),
|
|
newReachabilityInterval(11, 30),
|
|
newReachabilityInterval(31, 60),
|
|
newReachabilityInterval(61, 100),
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
interval: newReachabilityInterval(1, 100),
|
|
sizes: []uint64{25, 25},
|
|
expectedIntervals: []*reachabilityInterval{
|
|
newReachabilityInterval(1, 50),
|
|
newReachabilityInterval(51, 100),
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
interval: newReachabilityInterval(1, 100),
|
|
sizes: []uint64{1, 1},
|
|
expectedIntervals: []*reachabilityInterval{
|
|
newReachabilityInterval(1, 50),
|
|
newReachabilityInterval(51, 100),
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
interval: newReachabilityInterval(1, 100),
|
|
sizes: []uint64{33, 33, 33},
|
|
expectedIntervals: []*reachabilityInterval{
|
|
newReachabilityInterval(1, 33),
|
|
newReachabilityInterval(34, 66),
|
|
newReachabilityInterval(67, 100),
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
interval: newReachabilityInterval(1, 100),
|
|
sizes: []uint64{10, 15, 25},
|
|
expectedIntervals: []*reachabilityInterval{
|
|
newReachabilityInterval(1, 10),
|
|
newReachabilityInterval(11, 25),
|
|
newReachabilityInterval(26, 100),
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
interval: newReachabilityInterval(1, 100),
|
|
sizes: []uint64{25, 15, 10},
|
|
expectedIntervals: []*reachabilityInterval{
|
|
newReachabilityInterval(1, 75),
|
|
newReachabilityInterval(76, 90),
|
|
newReachabilityInterval(91, 100),
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
interval: newReachabilityInterval(1, 10_000),
|
|
sizes: []uint64{10, 10, 20},
|
|
expectedIntervals: []*reachabilityInterval{
|
|
newReachabilityInterval(1, 20),
|
|
newReachabilityInterval(21, 40),
|
|
newReachabilityInterval(41, 10_000),
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
interval: newReachabilityInterval(1, 100_000),
|
|
sizes: []uint64{31_000, 31_000, 30_001},
|
|
expectedIntervals: []*reachabilityInterval{
|
|
newReachabilityInterval(1, 35_000),
|
|
newReachabilityInterval(35_001, 69_999),
|
|
newReachabilityInterval(70_000, 100_000),
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for i, test := range tests {
|
|
intervals, err := test.interval.splitWithExponentialBias(test.sizes)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("TestSplitWithExponentialBias: splitWithExponentialBias unexpectedly failed in test #%d: %s", i, err)
|
|
}
|
|
if !reflect.DeepEqual(intervals, test.expectedIntervals) {
|
|
t.Errorf("TestSplitWithExponentialBias: unexpected intervals in test #%d. "+
|
|
"want: %s, got: %s", i, test.expectedIntervals, intervals)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestIsInFuture(t *testing.T) {
|
|
blocks := futureCoveringBlockSet{
|
|
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(2, 3)}},
|
|
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(4, 67)}},
|
|
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(67, 77)}},
|
|
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(657, 789)}},
|
|
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(1000, 1000)}},
|
|
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(1920, 1921)}},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
tests := []struct {
|
|
block *futureCoveringBlock
|
|
expectedResult bool
|
|
}{
|
|
{
|
|
block: &futureCoveringBlock{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(1, 1)}},
|
|
expectedResult: false,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
block: &futureCoveringBlock{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(5, 7)}},
|
|
expectedResult: true,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
block: &futureCoveringBlock{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(67, 76)}},
|
|
expectedResult: true,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
block: &futureCoveringBlock{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(78, 100)}},
|
|
expectedResult: false,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
block: &futureCoveringBlock{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(1980, 2000)}},
|
|
expectedResult: false,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
block: &futureCoveringBlock{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(1920, 1920)}},
|
|
expectedResult: true,
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for i, test := range tests {
|
|
result := blocks.isInFuture(test.block)
|
|
if result != test.expectedResult {
|
|
t.Errorf("TestIsInFuture: unexpected result in test #%d. Want: %t, got: %t",
|
|
i, test.expectedResult, result)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestInsertBlock(t *testing.T) {
|
|
blocks := futureCoveringBlockSet{
|
|
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(1, 3)}},
|
|
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(4, 67)}},
|
|
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(67, 77)}},
|
|
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(657, 789)}},
|
|
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(1000, 1000)}},
|
|
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(1920, 1921)}},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
tests := []struct {
|
|
toInsert []*futureCoveringBlock
|
|
expectedResult futureCoveringBlockSet
|
|
}{
|
|
{
|
|
toInsert: []*futureCoveringBlock{
|
|
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(5, 7)}},
|
|
},
|
|
expectedResult: futureCoveringBlockSet{
|
|
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(1, 3)}},
|
|
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(4, 67)}},
|
|
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(67, 77)}},
|
|
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(657, 789)}},
|
|
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(1000, 1000)}},
|
|
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(1920, 1921)}},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
toInsert: []*futureCoveringBlock{
|
|
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(65, 78)}},
|
|
},
|
|
expectedResult: futureCoveringBlockSet{
|
|
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(1, 3)}},
|
|
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(4, 67)}},
|
|
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(65, 78)}},
|
|
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(657, 789)}},
|
|
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(1000, 1000)}},
|
|
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(1920, 1921)}},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
toInsert: []*futureCoveringBlock{
|
|
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(88, 97)}},
|
|
},
|
|
expectedResult: futureCoveringBlockSet{
|
|
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(1, 3)}},
|
|
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(4, 67)}},
|
|
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(67, 77)}},
|
|
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(88, 97)}},
|
|
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(657, 789)}},
|
|
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(1000, 1000)}},
|
|
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(1920, 1921)}},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
toInsert: []*futureCoveringBlock{
|
|
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(88, 97)}},
|
|
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(3000, 3010)}},
|
|
},
|
|
expectedResult: futureCoveringBlockSet{
|
|
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(1, 3)}},
|
|
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(4, 67)}},
|
|
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(67, 77)}},
|
|
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(88, 97)}},
|
|
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(657, 789)}},
|
|
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(1000, 1000)}},
|
|
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(1920, 1921)}},
|
|
{treeNode: &reachabilityTreeNode{interval: newReachabilityInterval(3000, 3010)}},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for i, test := range tests {
|
|
// Create a clone of blocks so that we have a clean start for every test
|
|
blocksClone := make(futureCoveringBlockSet, len(blocks))
|
|
for i, block := range blocks {
|
|
blocksClone[i] = block
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for _, block := range test.toInsert {
|
|
blocksClone.insertBlock(block)
|
|
}
|
|
if !reflect.DeepEqual(blocksClone, test.expectedResult) {
|
|
t.Errorf("TestInsertBlock: unexpected result in test #%d. Want: %s, got: %s",
|
|
i, test.expectedResult, blocksClone)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestSplitFractionErrors(t *testing.T) {
|
|
interval := newReachabilityInterval(100, 200)
|
|
|
|
// Negative fraction
|
|
_, _, err := interval.splitFraction(-0.5)
|
|
if err == nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("TestSplitFractionErrors: splitFraction unexpectedly " +
|
|
"didn't return an error for a negative fraction")
|
|
}
|
|
expectedErrSubstring := "fraction must be between 0 and 1"
|
|
if !strings.Contains(err.Error(), expectedErrSubstring) {
|
|
t.Fatalf("TestSplitFractionErrors: splitFraction returned wrong error "+
|
|
"for a negative fraction. "+
|
|
"Want: %s, got: %s", expectedErrSubstring, err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Fraction > 1
|
|
_, _, err = interval.splitFraction(1.5)
|
|
if err == nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("TestSplitFractionErrors: splitFraction unexpectedly " +
|
|
"didn't return an error for a fraction greater than 1")
|
|
}
|
|
expectedErrSubstring = "fraction must be between 0 and 1"
|
|
if !strings.Contains(err.Error(), expectedErrSubstring) {
|
|
t.Fatalf("TestSplitFractionErrors: splitFraction returned wrong error "+
|
|
"for a fraction greater than 1. "+
|
|
"Want: %s, got: %s", expectedErrSubstring, err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Splitting an empty interval
|
|
emptyInterval := newReachabilityInterval(1, 0)
|
|
_, _, err = emptyInterval.splitFraction(0.5)
|
|
if err == nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("TestSplitFractionErrors: splitFraction unexpectedly " +
|
|
"didn't return an error for an empty interval")
|
|
}
|
|
expectedErrSubstring = "cannot split an empty interval"
|
|
if !strings.Contains(err.Error(), expectedErrSubstring) {
|
|
t.Fatalf("TestSplitFractionErrors: splitFraction returned wrong error "+
|
|
"for an empty interval. "+
|
|
"Want: %s, got: %s", expectedErrSubstring, err)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestSplitExactErrors(t *testing.T) {
|
|
interval := newReachabilityInterval(100, 199)
|
|
|
|
// Sum of sizes greater than the size of the interval
|
|
sizes := []uint64{50, 51}
|
|
_, err := interval.splitExact(sizes)
|
|
if err == nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("TestSplitExactErrors: splitExact unexpectedly " +
|
|
"didn't return an error for (sum of sizes) > (size of interval)")
|
|
}
|
|
expectedErrSubstring := "sum of sizes must be equal to the interval's size"
|
|
if !strings.Contains(err.Error(), expectedErrSubstring) {
|
|
t.Fatalf("TestSplitExactErrors: splitExact returned wrong error "+
|
|
"for (sum of sizes) > (size of interval). "+
|
|
"Want: %s, got: %s", expectedErrSubstring, err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Sum of sizes smaller than the size of the interval
|
|
sizes = []uint64{50, 49}
|
|
_, err = interval.splitExact(sizes)
|
|
if err == nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("TestSplitExactErrors: splitExact unexpectedly " +
|
|
"didn't return an error for (sum of sizes) < (size of interval)")
|
|
}
|
|
expectedErrSubstring = "sum of sizes must be equal to the interval's size"
|
|
if !strings.Contains(err.Error(), expectedErrSubstring) {
|
|
t.Fatalf("TestSplitExactErrors: splitExact returned wrong error "+
|
|
"for (sum of sizes) < (size of interval). "+
|
|
"Want: %s, got: %s", expectedErrSubstring, err)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestSplitWithExponentialBiasErrors(t *testing.T) {
|
|
interval := newReachabilityInterval(100, 199)
|
|
|
|
// Sum of sizes greater than the size of the interval
|
|
sizes := []uint64{50, 51}
|
|
_, err := interval.splitWithExponentialBias(sizes)
|
|
if err == nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("TestSplitWithExponentialBiasErrors: splitWithExponentialBias " +
|
|
"unexpectedly didn't return an error")
|
|
}
|
|
expectedErrSubstring := "sum of sizes must be less than or equal to the interval's size"
|
|
if !strings.Contains(err.Error(), expectedErrSubstring) {
|
|
t.Fatalf("TestSplitWithExponentialBiasErrors: splitWithExponentialBias "+
|
|
"returned wrong error. Want: %s, got: %s", expectedErrSubstring, err)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestReindexIntervalErrors(t *testing.T) {
|
|
// Create a treeNode and give it size = 100
|
|
treeNode := newReachabilityTreeNode(&blockNode{})
|
|
treeNode.setInterval(newReachabilityInterval(0, 99))
|
|
|
|
// Add a chain of 100 child treeNodes to treeNode
|
|
var err error
|
|
currentTreeNode := treeNode
|
|
for i := 0; i < 100; i++ {
|
|
childTreeNode := newReachabilityTreeNode(&blockNode{})
|
|
_, err = currentTreeNode.addChild(childTreeNode)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
break
|
|
}
|
|
currentTreeNode = childTreeNode
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// At the 100th addChild we expect a reindex. This reindex should
|
|
// fail because our initial treeNode only has size = 100, and the
|
|
// reindex requires size > 100.
|
|
// This simulates the case when (somehow) there's more than 2^64
|
|
// blocks in the DAG, since the genesis block has size = 2^64.
|
|
if err == nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("TestReindexIntervalErrors: reindexIntervals " +
|
|
"unexpectedly didn't return an error")
|
|
}
|
|
if !strings.Contains(err.Error(), "missing tree parent during reindexing") {
|
|
t.Fatalf("TestReindexIntervalErrors: reindexIntervals "+
|
|
"returned an expected error: %s", err)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestFutureCoveringBlockSetString(t *testing.T) {
|
|
treeNodeA := newReachabilityTreeNode(&blockNode{})
|
|
treeNodeA.setInterval(newReachabilityInterval(123, 456))
|
|
treeNodeB := newReachabilityTreeNode(&blockNode{})
|
|
treeNodeB.setInterval(newReachabilityInterval(457, 789))
|
|
futureCoveringSet := futureCoveringBlockSet{
|
|
&futureCoveringBlock{treeNode: treeNodeA},
|
|
&futureCoveringBlock{treeNode: treeNodeB},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
str := futureCoveringSet.String()
|
|
expectedStr := "[123,456][457,789]"
|
|
if str != expectedStr {
|
|
t.Fatalf("TestFutureCoveringBlockSetString: unexpected "+
|
|
"string. Want: %s, got: %s", expectedStr, str)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestReachabilityTreeNodeString(t *testing.T) {
|
|
treeNodeA := newReachabilityTreeNode(&blockNode{})
|
|
treeNodeA.setInterval(newReachabilityInterval(100, 199))
|
|
treeNodeB1 := newReachabilityTreeNode(&blockNode{})
|
|
treeNodeB1.setInterval(newReachabilityInterval(100, 150))
|
|
treeNodeB2 := newReachabilityTreeNode(&blockNode{})
|
|
treeNodeB2.setInterval(newReachabilityInterval(150, 199))
|
|
treeNodeC := newReachabilityTreeNode(&blockNode{})
|
|
treeNodeC.setInterval(newReachabilityInterval(100, 149))
|
|
treeNodeA.children = []*reachabilityTreeNode{treeNodeB1, treeNodeB2}
|
|
treeNodeB2.children = []*reachabilityTreeNode{treeNodeC}
|
|
|
|
str := treeNodeA.String()
|
|
expectedStr := "[100,149]\n[100,150][150,199]\n[100,199]"
|
|
if str != expectedStr {
|
|
t.Fatalf("TestReachabilityTreeNodeString: unexpected "+
|
|
"string. Want: %s, got: %s", expectedStr, str)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|