kaspad/domain/consensus/processes/consensusstatemanager/resolve_block_status_test.go
Ori Newman cb9d7e313d
Implement Clone and Equal for all model types (#1155)
* [NOD-1575] Implement Clone and Equal for all model types

* [NOD-1575] Add assertion for transaction ID equality

* [NOD-1575] Use DomainTransaction.Equal to compare to expected coinbase transaction

* [NOD-1575] Add TestDomainBlockHeader_Clone

* [NOD-1575] Don't clone nil values

* [NOD-1575] Add type assertions

* [NOD-1575] Don't clone nil values

* [NOD-1575] Add missing Equals

* [NOD-1575] Add length checks

* [NOD-1575] Update comment

* [NOD-1575] Check length for TransactionAcceptanceData

* [NOD-1575] Explicitly clone nils where needed

* [NOD-1575] Clone tx id

* [NOD-1575] Flip condition

* Nod 1576 make coverage tests for equal clone inside model externalapi (#1177)

* [NOD-1576] Make coverage tests for equal and clone inside model and externalapi

* Some formatting and naming fixes

* Made transactionToCompare type exported

* Added some tests and made some changes to the tests code

* No changes made

* Some formatting and naming changes made

* Made better test coverage for externalapi clone and equal functions

* Changed expected result for two cases

* Added equal and clone functions tests for ghostdag and utxodiff

* Added tests

* [NOD-1576] Implement reachabilitydata equal/clone unit tests

* [NOD-1576]  Full coverage of reachabilitydata equal/clone unit tests

* Made changes and handling panic to transaction_equal_clone_test.go and formating of utxodiff_equal_clone_test.go

* Added recoverForEqual2 for handling panic to transaction_equal_clone_test.go

* [NOD-1576]  Full coverage of transaction equal unit test

* [NOD-1576] Add expects panic

* [NOD-1576] Allow composites in go vet

* [NOD-1576] Code review fixes (#1223)

* [NOD-1576] Code review fixes

* [NOD-1576] Code review fixes part 2

* [NOD-1576] Fix wrong name

Co-authored-by: karim1king <karimkaspersky@yahoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Ori Newman <orinewman1@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Karim <karim1king@users.noreply.github.com>

* Fix merge errors

* Use Equal where possible

* Use Equal where possible

* Use Equal where possible

Co-authored-by: andrey-hash <74914043+andrey-hash@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: karim1king <karimkaspersky@yahoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Karim <karim1king@users.noreply.github.com>
2020-12-22 17:38:54 +02:00

239 lines
10 KiB
Go

package consensusstatemanager_test
import (
"errors"
"testing"
"github.com/kaspanet/kaspad/domain/consensus/ruleerrors"
"github.com/kaspanet/kaspad/domain/consensus/utils/consensushashing"
"github.com/kaspanet/kaspad/domain/consensus"
"github.com/kaspanet/kaspad/domain/consensus/model/externalapi"
"github.com/kaspanet/kaspad/domain/consensus/utils/testutils"
"github.com/kaspanet/kaspad/domain/consensus/utils/transactionhelper"
"github.com/kaspanet/kaspad/domain/dagconfig"
)
func TestDoubleSpends(t *testing.T) {
testutils.ForAllNets(t, true, func(t *testing.T, params *dagconfig.Params) {
params.BlockCoinbaseMaturity = 0
factory := consensus.NewFactory()
consensus, teardown, err := factory.NewTestConsensus(params, "TestUTXOCommitment")
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("Error setting up consensus: %+v", err)
}
defer teardown(false)
// Mine chain of two blocks to fund our double spend
firstBlockHash, _, err := consensus.AddBlock([]*externalapi.DomainHash{params.GenesisHash}, nil, nil)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("Error creating firstBlock: %+v", err)
}
fundingBlockHash, _, err := consensus.AddBlock([]*externalapi.DomainHash{firstBlockHash}, nil, nil)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("Error creating fundingBlock: %+v", err)
}
fundingBlock, err := consensus.GetBlock(fundingBlockHash)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("Error getting fundingBlock: %+v", err)
}
// Get funding transaction
fundingTransaction := fundingBlock.Transactions[transactionhelper.CoinbaseTransactionIndex]
// Create two transactions that spends the same output, but with different IDs
spendingTransaction1, err := testutils.CreateTransaction(fundingTransaction)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("Error creating spendingTransaction1: %+v", err)
}
spendingTransaction2, err := testutils.CreateTransaction(fundingTransaction)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("Error creating spendingTransaction2: %+v", err)
}
spendingTransaction2.Outputs[0].Value-- // tweak the value to create a different ID
spendingTransaction1ID := consensushashing.TransactionID(spendingTransaction1)
spendingTransaction2ID := consensushashing.TransactionID(spendingTransaction2)
if spendingTransaction1ID.Equal(spendingTransaction2ID) {
t.Fatalf("spendingTransaction1 and spendingTransaction2 ids are equal")
}
// Mine a block with spendingTransaction1 and make sure that it's valid
goodBlock1Hash, _, err := consensus.AddBlock([]*externalapi.DomainHash{fundingBlockHash}, nil,
[]*externalapi.DomainTransaction{spendingTransaction1})
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("Error adding goodBlock1: %+v", err)
}
goodBlock1Status, err := consensus.BlockStatusStore().Get(consensus.DatabaseContext(), goodBlock1Hash)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("Error getting status of goodBlock1: %+v", err)
}
if goodBlock1Status != externalapi.StatusUTXOValid {
t.Fatalf("GoodBlock1 status expected to be '%s', but is '%s'", externalapi.StatusUTXOValid, goodBlock1Status)
}
// To check that a block containing the same transaction already in it's past is disqualified:
// Add a block on top of goodBlock, containing spendingTransaction1, and make sure it's disqualified
doubleSpendingBlock1Hash, _, err := consensus.AddBlock([]*externalapi.DomainHash{goodBlock1Hash}, nil,
[]*externalapi.DomainTransaction{spendingTransaction1})
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("Error adding doubleSpendingBlock1: %+v", err)
}
doubleSpendingBlock1Status, err := consensus.BlockStatusStore().Get(consensus.DatabaseContext(), doubleSpendingBlock1Hash)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("Error getting status of goodBlock: %+v", err)
}
if doubleSpendingBlock1Status != externalapi.StatusDisqualifiedFromChain {
t.Fatalf("doubleSpendingBlock1 status expected to be '%s', but is '%s'",
externalapi.StatusDisqualifiedFromChain, doubleSpendingBlock1Status)
}
// To check that a block containing a transaction that double-spends a transaction that
// is in it's past is disqualified:
// Add a block on top of goodBlock, containing spendingTransaction2, and make sure it's disqualified
doubleSpendingBlock2Hash, _, err := consensus.AddBlock([]*externalapi.DomainHash{goodBlock1Hash}, nil,
[]*externalapi.DomainTransaction{spendingTransaction2})
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("Error adding doubleSpendingBlock2: %+v", err)
}
doubleSpendingBlock2Status, err := consensus.BlockStatusStore().Get(consensus.DatabaseContext(), doubleSpendingBlock2Hash)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("Error getting status of goodBlock: %+v", err)
}
if doubleSpendingBlock2Status != externalapi.StatusDisqualifiedFromChain {
t.Fatalf("doubleSpendingBlock2 status expected to be '%s', but is '%s'",
externalapi.StatusDisqualifiedFromChain, doubleSpendingBlock2Status)
}
// To make sure that a block double-spending itself is rejected:
// Add a block on top of goodBlock, containing both spendingTransaction1 and spendingTransaction2, and make
// sure AddBlock returns a RuleError
_, _, err = consensus.AddBlock([]*externalapi.DomainHash{goodBlock1Hash}, nil,
[]*externalapi.DomainTransaction{spendingTransaction1, spendingTransaction2})
if err == nil {
t.Fatalf("No error when adding a self-double-spending block")
}
if !errors.Is(err, ruleerrors.ErrDoubleSpendInSameBlock) {
t.Fatalf("Adding self-double-spending block should have "+
"returned ruleerrors.ErrDoubleSpendInSameBlock, but instead got: %+v", err)
}
// To make sure that a block containing the same transaction twice is rejected:
// Add a block on top of goodBlock, containing spendingTransaction1 twice, and make
// sure AddBlock returns a RuleError
_, _, err = consensus.AddBlock([]*externalapi.DomainHash{goodBlock1Hash}, nil,
[]*externalapi.DomainTransaction{spendingTransaction1, spendingTransaction1})
if err == nil {
t.Fatalf("No error when adding a block containing the same transactin twice")
}
if !errors.Is(err, ruleerrors.ErrDuplicateTx) {
t.Fatalf("Adding block that contains the same transaction twice should have "+
"returned ruleerrors.ErrDuplicateTx, but instead got: %+v", err)
}
// Check that a block will not get disqualified if it has a transaction that double spends
// a transaction from its anticone.
goodBlock2Hash, _, err := consensus.AddBlock([]*externalapi.DomainHash{fundingBlockHash}, nil,
[]*externalapi.DomainTransaction{spendingTransaction2})
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("Error adding goodBlock: %+v", err)
}
//use ResolveBlockStatus, since goodBlock2 might not be the selectedTip
goodBlock2Status, err := consensus.ConsensusStateManager().ResolveBlockStatus(goodBlock2Hash)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("Error getting status of goodBlock: %+v", err)
}
if goodBlock2Status != externalapi.StatusUTXOValid {
t.Fatalf("GoodBlock2 status expected to be '%s', but is '%s'", externalapi.StatusUTXOValid, goodBlock2Status)
}
})
}
func TestResolveBlockStatusSanity(t *testing.T) {
testutils.ForAllNets(t, true, func(t *testing.T, params *dagconfig.Params) {
consensus, teardown, err := consensus.NewFactory().NewTestConsensus(params, "TestResolveBlockStatusSanity")
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("Error setting up consensus: %+v", err)
}
defer teardown(false)
genesisHash := params.GenesisHash
allHashes := []*externalapi.DomainHash{genesisHash}
// Make sure that the status of genesisHash is valid
genesisStatus, err := consensus.BlockStatusStore().Get(consensus.DatabaseContext(), genesisHash)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("error getting genesis status: %s", err)
}
if genesisStatus != externalapi.StatusUTXOValid {
t.Fatalf("genesis is unexpectedly non-valid. Its status is: %s", genesisStatus)
}
chainLength := int(params.K) + 1
// Add a chain of blocks over the genesis and make sure all their
// statuses are valid
currentHash := genesisHash
for i := 0; i < chainLength; i++ {
addedBlockHash, _, err := consensus.AddBlock([]*externalapi.DomainHash{currentHash}, nil, nil)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("error adding block %d: %s", i, err)
}
blockStatus, err := consensus.BlockStatusStore().Get(consensus.DatabaseContext(), addedBlockHash)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("error getting block %d (%s) status: %s", i, addedBlockHash, err)
}
if blockStatus != externalapi.StatusUTXOValid {
t.Fatalf("block %d (%s) is unexpectedly non-valid. Its status is: %s", i, addedBlockHash, blockStatus)
}
currentHash = addedBlockHash
allHashes = append(allHashes, addedBlockHash)
}
// Add another chain of blocks over the genesis that's shorter than
// the original chain by 1. Here we expect all the statuses to be
// StatusUTXOPendingVerification
currentHash = genesisHash
for i := 0; i < chainLength-1; i++ {
addedBlockHash, _, err := consensus.AddBlock([]*externalapi.DomainHash{currentHash}, nil, nil)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("error adding block %d: %s", i, err)
}
blockStatus, err := consensus.BlockStatusStore().Get(consensus.DatabaseContext(), addedBlockHash)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("error getting block %d (%s) status: %s", i, addedBlockHash, err)
}
if blockStatus != externalapi.StatusUTXOPendingVerification {
t.Fatalf("block %d (%s) has unexpected status. "+
"Want: %s, got: %s", i, addedBlockHash, externalapi.StatusUTXOPendingVerification, blockStatus)
}
currentHash = addedBlockHash
allHashes = append(allHashes, addedBlockHash)
}
// Add another two blocks to the second chain. This should trigger
// resolving the entire chain
for i := 0; i < 2; i++ {
addedBlockHash, _, err := consensus.AddBlock([]*externalapi.DomainHash{currentHash}, nil, nil)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("error adding block %d: %s", i, err)
}
currentHash = addedBlockHash
allHashes = append(allHashes, addedBlockHash)
}
// Make sure that all the blocks in the DAG now have StatusUTXOValid
for _, hash := range allHashes {
blockStatus, err := consensus.BlockStatusStore().Get(consensus.DatabaseContext(), hash)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("error getting block %s status: %s", hash, err)
}
if blockStatus != externalapi.StatusUTXOValid {
t.Fatalf("block %s is unexpectedly non-valid. Its status is: %s", hash, blockStatus)
}
}
})
}