mirror of
https://github.com/kaspanet/kaspad.git
synced 2025-05-31 19:26:42 +00:00
cb9d7e313d
* [NOD-1575] Implement Clone and Equal for all model types * [NOD-1575] Add assertion for transaction ID equality * [NOD-1575] Use DomainTransaction.Equal to compare to expected coinbase transaction * [NOD-1575] Add TestDomainBlockHeader_Clone * [NOD-1575] Don't clone nil values * [NOD-1575] Add type assertions * [NOD-1575] Don't clone nil values * [NOD-1575] Add missing Equals * [NOD-1575] Add length checks * [NOD-1575] Update comment * [NOD-1575] Check length for TransactionAcceptanceData * [NOD-1575] Explicitly clone nils where needed * [NOD-1575] Clone tx id * [NOD-1575] Flip condition * Nod 1576 make coverage tests for equal clone inside model externalapi (#1177) * [NOD-1576] Make coverage tests for equal and clone inside model and externalapi * Some formatting and naming fixes * Made transactionToCompare type exported * Added some tests and made some changes to the tests code * No changes made * Some formatting and naming changes made * Made better test coverage for externalapi clone and equal functions * Changed expected result for two cases * Added equal and clone functions tests for ghostdag and utxodiff * Added tests * [NOD-1576] Implement reachabilitydata equal/clone unit tests * [NOD-1576] Full coverage of reachabilitydata equal/clone unit tests * Made changes and handling panic to transaction_equal_clone_test.go and formating of utxodiff_equal_clone_test.go * Added recoverForEqual2 for handling panic to transaction_equal_clone_test.go * [NOD-1576] Full coverage of transaction equal unit test * [NOD-1576] Add expects panic * [NOD-1576] Allow composites in go vet * [NOD-1576] Code review fixes (#1223) * [NOD-1576] Code review fixes * [NOD-1576] Code review fixes part 2 * [NOD-1576] Fix wrong name Co-authored-by: karim1king <karimkaspersky@yahoo.com> Co-authored-by: Ori Newman <orinewman1@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Karim <karim1king@users.noreply.github.com> * Fix merge errors * Use Equal where possible * Use Equal where possible * Use Equal where possible Co-authored-by: andrey-hash <74914043+andrey-hash@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: karim1king <karimkaspersky@yahoo.com> Co-authored-by: Karim <karim1king@users.noreply.github.com>
51 lines
1.9 KiB
Go
51 lines
1.9 KiB
Go
package blockprocessor
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
"github.com/kaspanet/kaspad/domain/consensus/model/externalapi"
|
|
"github.com/kaspanet/kaspad/domain/consensus/ruleerrors"
|
|
"github.com/kaspanet/kaspad/domain/consensus/utils/consensushashing"
|
|
"github.com/pkg/errors"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
func (bp *blockProcessor) validateAndInsertPruningPoint(newPruningPoint *externalapi.DomainBlock, serializedUTXOSet []byte) error {
|
|
log.Info("Checking that the given pruning point is the expected pruning point")
|
|
|
|
expectedNewPruningPointHash, err := bp.pruningManager.CalculatePruningPointByHeaderSelectedTip()
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
return err
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
newPruningPointHash := consensushashing.BlockHash(newPruningPoint)
|
|
|
|
if !expectedNewPruningPointHash.Equal(newPruningPointHash) {
|
|
return errors.Wrapf(ruleerrors.ErrUnexpectedPruningPoint, "expected pruning point %s but got %s",
|
|
expectedNewPruningPointHash, newPruningPointHash)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// We have to validate the pruning point block before we set the new pruning point in consensusStateManager.
|
|
log.Infof("Validating the new pruning point %s", newPruningPointHash)
|
|
err = bp.validateBlockAndDiscardChanges(newPruningPoint, true)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
return err
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
log.Infof("Updating consensus state manager according to the new pruning point %s", newPruningPointHash)
|
|
err = bp.consensusStateManager.UpdatePruningPoint(newPruningPoint, serializedUTXOSet)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
return err
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
log.Infof("Inserting the new pruning point %s", newPruningPointHash)
|
|
_, err = bp.validateAndInsertBlock(newPruningPoint, true)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
if errors.As(err, &ruleerrors.RuleError{}) {
|
|
// This should never happen because we already validated the block with bp.validateBlockAndDiscardChanges.
|
|
// We use Errorf so it won't be identified later on to be a rule error and will eventually cause
|
|
// the program to panic.
|
|
return errors.Errorf("validateAndInsertBlock returned unexpected rule error while processing "+
|
|
"the pruning point: %+v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
return nil
|
|
}
|