1. authentication data not loaded on member startup
2. etcdctl move-leader may fail for multiple endpoints
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Wang <wachao@vmware.com>
Due to a duplicate call of clientConfigFromCmd, the move-leader command
would fail with "conflicting environment variable is shadowed by corresponding command-line flag".
Also in scenarios where no command-line flag was supplied.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Jungblut <tjungblu@redhat.com>
A WAL object was closed by defer, however the WAL was rewritten afterwards,
so defer closed already closed WAL but not the new one. It caused a data
race between writing file and cleaning up a temporary test directory,
which led to a non-deterministic bug.
Fixes#14332
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sokolov <vsvastey@gmail.com>
The alarm list is the only exception that doesn't move consistent_index
forward. The reproduction steps are as simple as,
```
etcd --snapshot-count=5 &
for i in {1..6}; do etcdctl alarm list; done
kill -9 <etcd_pid>
etcd
```
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Wang <wachao@vmware.com>
Starting in Go 1.17, Installing executables with go get is deprecated. go install may be used instead.
Refer to https://go.dev/doc/go-get-install-deprecation
Signed-off-by: Hongfei Huang <853885165@qq.com>
For a cluster with only one member, the raft always send identical
unstable entries and committed entries to etcdserver, and etcd
responds to the client once it finishes (actually partially) the
applying workflow.
When the client receives the response, it doesn't mean etcd has already
successfully saved the data, including BoltDB and WAL, because:
1. etcd commits the boltDB transaction periodically instead of on each request;
2. etcd saves WAL entries in parallel with applying the committed entries.
Accordingly, it may run into a situation of data loss when the etcd crashes
immediately after responding to the client and before the boltDB and WAL
successfully save the data to disk.
Note that this issue can only happen for clusters with only one member.
For clusters with multiple members, it isn't an issue, because etcd will
not commit & apply the data before it being replicated to majority members.
When the client receives the response, it means the data must have been applied.
It further means the data must have been committed.
Note: for clusters with multiple members, the raft will never send identical
unstable entries and committed entries to etcdserver.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Wang <wachao@vmware.com>
When we can't reach quorum, we were waiting forever and never sending
the systemd notify message. As a result, systemd would eventually time out
and restart the etcd process which likely would make the unhealthy cluster
in an even worse state
Improves #13785
Signed-off-by: Nicolai Moore <niconorsk@gmail.com>
