"X-Content-Type-Options" was being autoadded, but none of the
test maps took it into account. I saw that "Content-Type" was
also being deleted, so I figured that was the best solution
for this as well.
It specifies request timeout error possibly caused by connection lost,
and print out better log for user to understand.
It handles two cases:
1. the leader cannot connect to majority of cluster.
2. the connection between follower and leader is down for a while,
and it losts proposals.
log format:
```
20:04:19 etcd3 | 2015-08-25 20:04:19.368126 E | etcdhttp: etcdserver:
request timed out, possibly due to connection lost
20:04:19 etcd3 | 2015-08-25 20:04:19.368227 E | etcdhttp: etcdserver:
request timed out, possibly due to connection lost
```
It is good to print it in debug output:
```
21:56:12 etcd1 | 2015-08-25 21:56:12.162406 I | etcdmain: peerTLS: cert
= certs/etcd1.pem, key = certs/etcd1-key.pem, ca = , trusted-ca =
certs/ca.pem, client-cert-auth = true
```
We always want to use GOMAXPROCS() as the way go parses it. When in go1.4, we
want to expose GOMAXPROCS value, so we set GOMAXPROCS explicitly as the
way go 1.4 does and print it out.
But it becomes a problem when go 1.5 changes the way to set GOMAXPROCS.
Fix the problem by stop setting GOMAXPROCS and get its value directly.
Due to this change, it sets default GOMAXPROCS to the
number of CPUs available when compiling in go 1.5, which matches how go 1.5 works:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1At2Ls5_fhJQ59kDK2DFVhFu3g5mATSXqqV5QrxinasI/edit
This is a behavior change in etcd 2.2.
The original workflow may fail to cancel if stop() cancels the finished
request just before dial() assigning a new cancel. This commit checks
streamReader status before setting cancel to avoid this problem.
It is tested at travis for 300 times. go 1.5 always works well, while
go 1.4 fails to stop once.
This problem is totally fixed at 1.5.
go1.5 adds a Request.Cancel channel, which allows for "race free"
cancellation
(8b4278ffb7).
Our implementation relies on it to always cancel in-flight request.
It includes the initial read benchmark for etcd v3.
This is the first step to give some rough thoughts. I haven't digged
deeper to answer some questions, including why its performance is not
better than HTTP + json, why one put will cause performance downgrade.
