rwindelz a2e5bae951 fix(store): TTL should range 1..n rather than 1..n+1 ...

was experiencing intermittent functional test fails where TTL was eg 101
when 100 was expected
informal testing on a windows platform shows Go times resolving to the
nanosecond but with an accuracy of approximately 1 millisecond
I believe some of the functional test steps would run in under a
millisecond and cause the TTL to be recomputed with the same time.Now()
value resulting in a TTL that was +1 from the expected

2014-01-19 21:45:53 -08:00

8.6 KiB

Raw Blame History

View Raw