etcd/Documentation/v2/benchmarks/etcd-3-demo-benchmarks.md
Gyu-Ho Lee 49fe77eea0 Documentation/v2: 'etcd v2' to the title
Signed-off-by: Gyu-Ho Lee <gyuhox@gmail.com>
2017-06-29 16:10:05 -07:00

48 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown

**This is the documentation for etcd2 releases. Read [etcd3 doc][v3-docs] for etcd3 releases.**
[v3-docs]: ../../docs.md#documentation
## Physical machines
GCE n1-highcpu-2 machine type
- 1x dedicated local SSD mounted under /var/lib/etcd
- 1x dedicated slow disk for the OS
- 1.8 GB memory
- 2x CPUs
- etcd version 2.2.0
## etcd Cluster
1 etcd member running in v3 demo mode
## Testing
Use [etcd v3 benchmark tool][etcd-v3-benchmark].
## Performance
### reading one single key
| key size in bytes | number of clients | read QPS | 90th Percentile Latency (ms) |
|-------------------|-------------------|----------|---------------|
| 256 | 1 | 2716 | 0.4 |
| 256 | 64 | 16623 | 6.1 |
| 256 | 256 | 16622 | 21.7 |
The performance is nearly the same as the one with empty server handler.
### reading one single key after putting
| key size in bytes | number of clients | read QPS | 90th Percentile Latency (ms) |
|-------------------|-------------------|----------|---------------|
| 256 | 1 | 2269 | 0.5 |
| 256 | 64 | 13582 | 8.6 |
| 256 | 256 | 13262 | 47.5 |
The performance with empty server handler is not affected by one put. So the
performance downgrade should be caused by storage package.
[etcd-v3-benchmark]: ../../../tools/benchmark/